[AVTCORE] [Errata Rejected] RFC6184 (4713)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 07 November 2023 09:13 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C17C1FB86C; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 01:13:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=0.732, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DGtSVcpT_djP; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 01:13:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6DE4C1D46FC; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 01:13:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 763F4119CD; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 01:13:01 -0800 (PST)
To: ibc@aliax.net, yekuiwang@huawei.com, even.roni@huawei.com, tom.kristensen@tandberg.com, rjesup@wgate.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, iesg@ietf.org, avt@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20231107091301.763F4119CD@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 01:13:01 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/I1jogrmT4XPRYEQCnWT7febjv3M>
Subject: [AVTCORE] [Errata Rejected] RFC6184 (4713)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 09:13:05 -0000

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6184,
"RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4713

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical

Reported by: IƱaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date Reported: 2016-06-17
Rejected by: Francesca Palombini (IESG)

Section: 8.1

Original Text
-------------
profile-level-id:
         A base16 [7] (hexadecimal) representation of the following
         three bytes in the sequence parameter

Corrected Text
--------------
profile-level-id:
         A base16 [7] (hexadecimal) representation of the following
         six bytes in the sequence parameter

Notes
-----
profile-level-id is composed of three 2-byte length fields.
 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
The original text is correct; 3 bytes in the binary representation become 6 text characters in base16. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6184 (draft-ietf-avt-rtp-rfc3984bis-12)
--------------------------------------
Title               : RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video
Publication Date    : May 2011
Author(s)           : Y.-K. Wang, R. Even, T. Kristensen, R. Jesup
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Audio/Video Transport
Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG