Re: [AVTCORE] Last Call: <draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-14.txt> (Securing the RTP Protocol Framework: Why RTP Does Not Mandate a Single Media Security Solution) to Informational RFC

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 09 December 2013 23:13 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125241AD948; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:13:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MaJcsmXGkDI2; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:13:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9671A8028; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:13:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hi5so4596969wib.14 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:13:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=agShKYkumjwHoGBtwIRAyj6LaaQIwp8e+Jtqu8+loag=; b=e7Q8kLBvx/j4Rhe+zbB9ucST7c/UlDV4rE8TMb1z3agNnALucQ9KooSp1Pu7tHORiH FgfxMG6EVt/9tmYf7rTXldemw9qUgsQ6BQbyq1+CLSBV/9d7JtOdWHO9Le2YBzEaHDub 9qYH9EnZExP+pGeczPz2U0ltd6stbLAXKkAHrAAVjdSy6tlB7W5OJkQdbl7ZUjy3P82R r4IBjLK0wEaYwNRPyy+c6qb5kX+qKL41qEqn0B7Y3fvIPhXcukgPUdTgMK/gmzOrZ8WE SwFnqJcOwkS5c2NgfkIZqm55pBOHjLzWdcsQTfirr79NQ0/8eh5ZlzHWyMhEzrL38crE ZPXQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.195.13.164 with SMTP id ez4mr18458737wjd.11.1386630796907; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:13:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.134.195 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:13:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0FA6EC2C-3FAB-4E72-882E-13640108C328@csperkins.org>
References: <20131122220752.31098.83432.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1286562B-6C43-4ADC-8999-C70CA356F587@cisco.com> <89E376B0-5555-40D8-A59E-0286CABC856C@csperkins.org> <BC503965-42C2-4E02-B7C2-70550EBB11C1@cisco.com> <0FA6EC2C-3FAB-4E72-882E-13640108C328@csperkins.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:13:16 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXzoG_ib5wccySOXK1EZ-12v9PEysy2YYnYTOvnSgz6=A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "avt@ietf.org WG" <avt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Last Call: <draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-14.txt> (Securing the RTP Protocol Framework: Why RTP Does Not Mandate a Single Media Security Solution) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 23:13:24 -0000

On 9 December 2013 14:59, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> wrote:
> If some part of the draft is unclear about this, and can possibly be interpreted to allow insecure use of RTP, please explain what, and we will fix it.

Let me theorize a little: the draft name
(draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory) might generate some false
reactions.  Thankfully, that's not going to appear in an RFC.