[AVTCORE] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-avtcore-cryptex-06: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 15 June 2022 13:27 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-avtcore-cryptex@ietf.org, avtcore-chairs@ietf.org, avt@ietf.org, bernard.aboba@gmail.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <165529965479.19101.2495322859321258515@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 06:27:34 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/IlyL7WM_c0GT6Ejd3Yxh4DKAdXg>
Subject: [AVTCORE] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-avtcore-cryptex-06: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-avtcore-cryptex-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-cryptex/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Paul's DISCUSS.

I believe that this document should formally Update rfc3711.  The mechanism
described here is a replacement for what rfc6904 defined.  That original
mechanism was tagged as formally Updating rfc3711 -- this work should also be
tagged that way.

[AVTCORE] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-i… Alvaro Retana via Datatracker