Re: [AVTCORE] Possible Additional functionalities for draft-brandenburg-avt-rtcp-for-idms

[Kevin Gross <[e-mail]>]

Welcome to the group. I've removed the cross-post to xrblock. We've been
discussing IDMS in this group (AVTCORE a.k.a. AVT). Here are some initial
comments:

   1. The sender and the MSAS are not necessarily co-located. You want to
   measure propagation time from sender to SCs not from MSAS to SCs.
   2. Propagation time is often a function of packet size. Measuring with
   small RTCP packets won't give you the same results as with larger packets
   containing media.
   3. Since the sender and all receivers have an NTP time reference, it is
   possible to measure propagaion time directly. It is not necessary to measure
   RTT and divide by two.
   4. One way of achieving coarse sync without modification to the IDMS
   proposal is to just start streaming with null media data. Once the MSAS
   receives IDMS XR reports from all receivers and distributes sync information
   to receivers and the receivers have done whatever they need to do to get in
   sync, the sender can be queued to start sending real data.

-- 
Kevin Gross
[phone]
Media Network Consultant
AVA Networks - www.AVAnw.com <http://www.avanw.com/>,
www.X192.org<http://www.x192.org/>


2011/10/11 Fernando Boronat Seguí <[e-mail]>

>  Dear Group members,
>
> As this is our first mail to the list, we introduce ourselves. We are
> Fernando Boronat and Mario Montagud, co-authors of the Internet Draft (I-D)
> “RTCP for inter-destination media synchronization”
> (draft-ietf-avtcore-idms-01.txt).
> As the I-D was accepted as a WG document, any changes will have to be
> approved by the AVTCORE group. So, we would like to know if you consider
> appropriate to introduce some additional functionalities to the proposed
> IDMS approach in the I-D.
>
> In many distributed applications it is required that all the receivers
> start the playout of the media stream almost simultaneously (we refer this
> as Coarse Sync) and, after that, all of them play-out the media in a
> synchronous way (we refer this as Fine Sync). Those processes are essential
> for acquiring IDMS. A Global Initial Playout Instant for all the
> geographically distributed receivers (SCs) in a media session could prevent
> from an initial playout time discrepancy (asynchrony) at the beginning of
> the playout of the media stream/s (if a fixed global initial buffering delay
> is set) mainly due to the variable network delays from the media server to
> each one of the SCs.
>
> Thus, we are thinking about including a new section in the I-D about
> possible packets for Coarse Sync for both the initial playout instant (at
> the begining of a media session) and the initial instant at each stage in
> which the session can be divided (we consider that a stage ends when no
> streams are transmitted during a fixed interval (it could be defined
> depending on the applications), and that the next stage starts when data is
> transmitted again).
>
> This technique has been considered in some previous IDMS works (see
> reference [Boronat09] in the I-D), but using proprietary protocols. The
> methods we propose here are based on the use of already defined and standard
> RTCP packets, which would avoid the introduction of proprietary closed
> solutions.
>
> Regarding the Initial Playout Instant, we have primarily thought about the
> use of already proposed RTCP XR packets (RFC 3611):
>
> 1. Use of RTCP XR with RRTR and DLRR report blocks (defined RFC 3611) for
> measuring the delay between MSAS and SCs, allowing MSAS to estimate the RTT
> for all the SCs, then calculate a common initial playout instant and then
> communicate it to all SCs by sending them an RTCP IDMS Packet (defined in
> the I-D). The RTCP IDMS packet must include the RTP Timestamp of the first
> MU to be sent by the source and its proper playout instant, which will be
> common for all of them.
> MSAS may estimate its round trip time (RTT) to the SCs by sending them an
> RTCP XR with the Receiver Reference Time Report Block and forcing (according
> to RFC 3611) them to reply by sending an RTCP XR with a DLRR Report Block.
> Notice that both XR blocks are defined in RFC 3611 to be used in the
> opposite way we propose.
>
> If this solution is not considered appropriate we could think about another
> solution based on the packets already defined in the I-D, but maybe we would
> need to change the format adding new field/s.
>
> 2. Once joined the session, if it is not started yet, all the SCs could
> start sending RTCP XR with IDMS block (until they receive the Initial
> Playout Instant indication, sent using the RTCP IDMS Packet) as it is
> defined in the I-D, but including only the essential timing information
> (e.g. the wallclock time at which the packet is sent by the SC) to let the
> MSAS estimate the one-way network delays (not round-trip as in the previous
> case) for each SC (assuming symmetric delays as in TCP) and calculate the
> Initial Playout Instant. For that purpose, some field of the RTCP XR IDMS
> block should be used to indicate the XR IDMS block is carrying out temporal
> information for Coarse Sync, and not for reporting about arrival/playout
> timing of a specific RTP packet.
> From the Initial Instant they will continue playing the streams and sending
> the RTCP XR with IDMS complete block (as currently defined in the I-D). It
> could be a possible solution.
>
> The process of the calculation of the optimum Initial Playout Instant must
> take into consideration some factors such as the maximum and minimum
> estimated delays, jitter values, expected duration of the session, or
> probable clock deviations, in order to allow enough buffered MUs to start
> the playout and to maintain it continuously, thus avoiding
> underflow/overflow situations (playout discontinuities), during the session.
> This process is out of the scope of the ID.
>
> With the introduction of the Coarse Sync functionality, the IDMS proposal
> can counteract the effect of the delay variability at the beginning of the
> playout of the media stream/s in each one of the stages in which a media
> session can be divided.
>
> We prefer the first method because there is no need to define new IDMS
> control messages (or to include some fields to already defined packets), but
> the use of already defined RTCP reports (RFC 3611) can be adapted for that
> purpose.
>
> Moreover, with the use of the first method, SCs do not have to send control
> messages once they join the session, which may possibly result on
> inefficient control traffic overhead. They will only have to send RTCP XR
> DLRR messages in response to a new incoming RTRR message from the source,
> which is who really knows the initial transmission time for the RTP media
> stream. Moreover, the Initial Playout Instant can be sent to the receivers
> by using the RTCP IDMS packet, already introduced in the I-D.
>
> Feedback will be much appreciated.
>
> Regards
> ========================================================================
> Dr. Fernando Boronat Seguí
> IEEE Senior Member
> Profesor Titular / Lecturer	
> Dept. Comunicaciones           Tlf.-+34+962 849 300 Ext.-49341
> Tlf. directo -+34+962 849 341  Fax.-+34+962 849 309 (Compartido)
> UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE VALENCIA-CAMPUS DE GANDIA
> Calle Pararaninfo, 1, CP. 46730, Grao de Gandia (Valencia), SPAIN
> ========================================================================
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
>
>