Re: [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7728 (5540)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 05 November 2018 10:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF561274D0 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:10:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W1YF2Fcv8Ave for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:10:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C1DF128DFD for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:10:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-88a1.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-88a1.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.136.161]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id wA5AAPq7087229 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Nov 2018 04:10:28 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <F3734772-084D-4443-BD30-CAD67554C717@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AB69F972-AC81-42BD-9DCB-23C0AC5E5E22"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.1 \(3445.101.1\))
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 17:10:24 +0700
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB49885B9DD6F0E2A111B4CE7C95CA0@DB7PR07MB4988.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>, "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
References: <87muqouumn.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <DB7PR07MB49885B9DD6F0E2A111B4CE7C95CA0@DB7PR07MB4988.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.101.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/Kjjc04qmIUzcxSbSK9-DGQ5yCTg>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7728 (5540)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 10:10:47 -0000


> On Nov 5, 2018, at 10:40 AM, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2018-11-05 09:28, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>>>> Corrected Text
>>>> --------------
>>>>  PAUSED SHALL contain a fixed-length 32-bit parameter at the start of
>>>>  the Type Specific field with the extended RTP sequence number of the
>>>>  last RTP packet sent before the RTP stream was paused, in the same
>>>>  format as the extended highest sequence number received
>>>>  (Section 6.4.1 of [RFC3550]), or, if no packet has been sent, the
>>>>  value one less than the sequence number that will be chosen for the
>>>>  next packet sent (modulo 2^32).
>> Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> writes:
>>> Do people have opinions on this errata report?
>> It looks like the erratum is correct as a correction.  The base RFC is
>> not as clear as I'd like regarding what this "extended RTP sequence
>> number" is, but in the context, I expect every reader to make the same
>> assumptions about how it is to be handled.
> 
> I agree that it is the likely interpretation. But, to be clear, I think
> we can accept this errata.

I marked it as “verified”.

Thanks!

Ben.