Re: [AVT] TimeStamp in the RFC2833 packet.

Section 6.4.4 of rtp-new discusses these issues.
Colin

--> "Oren Peleg" <OrenP@audiocodes.com>
writes:
> Thanks. It seems like a good idea. Probably should be added to the
> RTP-new draft.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Oren P.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Awais Ali [mailto:aali@i2telecom.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:22 PM
> To: Oren Peleg; schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
> Cc: avt@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [AVT] TimeStamp in the RFC2833 packet.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The solution I am following right now is the one from
> http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/rtp/ which says under "How is Jitter
> Computed"
>  
> "If several packets, say, within a video frame, bear the same timestamp,
> it is advisable to only use the first packet in a frame to compute the
> jitter. (This issue may be addressed in a future version of the
> specification.) ..."
>  
> I hope the future version of spec. mentioned here is coming soon, because
> this aspect of timestamp issue is quite confusing in the current one.
>  
> Regards
>  
> Ali Awais
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Oren  <mailto:OrenP@audiocodes.com> Peleg 
> To: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu 
> Cc: avt@ietf.org 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:46 AM
> Subject: [AVT] TimeStamp in the RFC2833 packet.
> 
> 
> How does the RFC2833 TimeStamp values come along with the RTCP report
> Jitter Calculation explained at the RFC1889?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Oren Peleg
> 
> Work phone No. : 03 - 5394167
> 
> Home phone No. : 03 - 5335913
> 
> Cell phone No. : 055 - 669613
> 
> Email : Oren.Peleg@audiocodes.com
> 
> 

-- 
Colin Perkins
csp@csperkins.org
_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt