Return-Path: <kmigoe@nsa.gov>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4361A0067
 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:08:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]
 autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id ChpmFDwI83Ai for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:08:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from emvm-gh1-uea08.nsa.gov (emvm-gh1-uea08.nsa.gov [63.239.67.9])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CC61A0053
 for <avt@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:08:29 -0800 (PST)
X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <4290682200074bb5@nsa.gov>
Received: from MSHT-GH1-UEA01.corp.nsa.gov (msht-gh1-uea01.corp.nsa.gov
 [10.215.227.18]) by nsa.gov ([63.239.67.9]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP
 Service 7.1; TLSv1/SSLv3 AES128-SHA (128/128)) id 4290682200074bb5 ;
 Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:08:47 -0500
Received: from MSMR-GH1-UEA08.corp.nsa.gov (10.215.225.3) by
 MSHT-GH1-UEA01.corp.nsa.gov (10.215.227.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.2.347.0; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:08:29 -0500
Received: from MSMR-GH1-UEA03.corp.nsa.gov ([10.215.224.3]) by
 MSMR-GH1-UEA08.corp.nsa.gov ([10.215.225.3]) with mapi id 14.02.0347.000;
 Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:08:28 -0500
From: "Igoe, Kevin M." <kmigoe@nsa.gov>
To: "'avt@ietf.org'" <avt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Are thare any existing uses of CCM mode in SRTP?
Thread-Index: AdBSySZw1rAEskNLRrukGWoZmrPASA==
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:08:27 +0000
Message-ID: <3C4AAD4B5304AB44A6BA85173B4675CABC7F0078@MSMR-GH1-UEA03.corp.nsa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.215.224.46]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/Lzweydjbamek5IqN5JnIEBTl1BA>
Subject: [AVTCORE] Are thare any existing uses of CCM mode in SRTP?
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>,
 <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>,
 <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:08:32 -0000

Despite its name, the ID draft-avtcore-srtp aes-gcm actually supports two (=
2) AEAD  modes of operation, GCM and CCM.  There are known GCM based develo=
pments underway, but  at a telechat held yesterday to discuss this ID it be=
came apparent that no one participating in the chat was aware of ANY use of=
 CCM in SRTP.  Hence it was suggested we purge CCM from the current ID =20

This is a call to the mailing list to see if anyone is aware of any concret=
e existing projects underway that use CCM mode in SRTP.  If there are none,=
 CCM will be eliminated from the current ID.=20

(Note that if at some date in the future someone wishes to deploy CCM in SR=
TP, a simple cut and paste from previous drafts of the current ID can be us=
ed to craft a new CCM only ID.)

