Re: [AVTCORE] update to RFC5285

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Wed, 30 September 2015 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2151A86F6 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 06:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iGYhCWK9k6hv for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 06:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 724831A86EF for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 06:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so195861194wic.1 for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 06:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=KhsX4VwYyeOvnHD3gF3R79kfqQmhlkNB10TU5/MJiIg=; b=aSPBExWIO/5LdXuj/sWpUDhRdO19toJCVe8FIHqWPmPE3hU2MpKIMUsrj53Szc/7PA 13vtC8hCAWNTibb38ts3A/tHRgURIx9GPNqhzkEXz1KAOIZlYduHuUSDGDWVw0XwlfVA SkyL38um+n/5zmeARbNiNm1Vo/H+MSW7jr54XJNMx0s616dwh5ciOIMJtxrfsy9nPsxG BdJoYxSRqBI97BFzFI44MRQeydWyZSlwjSmkyo2UhTJFi7nQyqz73y/2chnBwFvFgdo1 t66ciAPryQ1ObO7/Ucl8TCeTAZE1fsJ48qPGiuQ2cknOFBXzPJAI/IMMCtvPh/rcZoSa s/sg==
X-Received: by 10.194.171.3 with SMTP id aq3mr4355786wjc.54.1443620413793; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 06:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RoniPC (bzq-109-65-15-14.red.bezeqint.net. [109.65.15.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fn4sm836248wib.11.2015.09.30.06.40.12 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 06:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: 'Colin Perkins' <csp@csperkins.org>
References: <022f01d0faf1$2f4dbaf0$8de930d0$@gmail.com> <E93C2099-3579-4823-AAAE-54E04A70A2B5@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <E93C2099-3579-4823-AAAE-54E04A70A2B5@csperkins.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:40:10 +0300
Message-ID: <02bc01d0fb85$8779e840$966db8c0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQKfaIb7ff85wkE574Ut5BWe0yfOkwHrW81xnKjeWCA=
Content-Language: he
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/MBCiED6SNeHNE6MY-61eZxD-Rxs>
Cc: avt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] update to RFC5285
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:40:17 -0000

Colin,
Thanks, inline
Roni

-----Original Message-----
From: Colin Perkins [mailto:csp@csperkins.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 1:31 PM
To: Roni Even
Cc: avt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] update to RFC5285

Hi Roni,

> On 29 Sep 2015, at 20:58, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-even-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-00.txt   updates RFC5285 allowing mixing one byte and two bytes RTP header extensions in the same RTP stream. This mode is negotiated using a new SDP attribute.

This looks good, but I had a couple of quick comments:

- Section 4.1 changes “MUST NOT be mixed” to “MAY be mixed”, but that’s inconsistent with Section 6. I think Section 4.1 ought to say “MUST NOT be mixed unless support for mixing one- and two-byte header extensions is signalled as in Section 6”. 

RE: OK, correct

- The draft needs to define the ABNF for the new “mix-headers” SDP attribute. I also suggest “a=extmap-allow-mixed” might be a more consistent name than “a=mixed-headers”.

RE: In this case there is no ABNF in  draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation for "rtcp-rgrp". It is a similar attribute

- The draft removes the description of how IANA should manage the namespace, and the initial registrations. I don’t think this should be removed, but if it is, the IANA considerations needs an additional paragraph stating that the IANA registry for RTP Compact Header Extensions is to be managed in accordance with RFC 5285.

RE: I will look how to do it since this document does not define new registry, so I will just ask to update the reference to this document (does this make sense?)

Cheers,
Colin




-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/