[AVTCORE] AD review of draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-srtp

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Sun, 24 November 2013 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5BD1AE18C for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 12:25:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2fIkeVTiK0VO for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 12:25:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com (mail-oa0-f51.google.com [209.85.219.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA201AE076 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 12:25:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id i7so3453222oag.24 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 12:24:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HP/ehs0xBTH/Jy8ypba79dG61J3+F7Ip9B4TiojhLKM=; b=OwAZiXdeFYxKxoLZdhUfLYPZojxKsOpIDEgzCeCQ4zTPGui1rnVhpIsY32O3fL/C0n gzMtMk7GbTt7B0XZFH6yWt/JlGhfgnAuiwxGcehnOvduH3zMbuyG4YdBsYEBsjcOXfvF fw1RYQ7OC3PkmkZdtSIq9Hd5HJ2whlD0toe+yL7lXiYrY256oCXOoXGD/o3/8p6EEyID xDJTRLQgGAwE92rWnftgnwuk3Nd2YbHulkqIAJBP4izVoKGqlF26KZs3ebnCKCMzfeqR gmTb2LZQ9jx8qCm724xQk5GSZyO1d6PkDjzXhb3gHjhT5Q1ArLqpAk9D+mFzShky+Elv k1Dg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl4SDG6vW9JdEZm1Uhz7zlhCy4V206ikBHw3y7ozYFl1rByB09gqGncqgk7bzszCKbQ0b5b
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.246.39 with SMTP id xt7mr21683696obc.16.1385324693474; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 12:24:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.31.74 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 12:24:53 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 15:24:53 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL02cgTCnXNFpSzQ=ppATEOiah=VP7w7+FqC63c9OZq=c5_zQA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-srtp@tools.ietf.org, "avtcore-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <avtcore-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, avt@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2e22440d32404ebf20a93
Subject: [AVTCORE] AD review of draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-srtp
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 20:25:02 -0000

I have reviewed this document in preparation for IETF LC, and think it
looks OK.  I'm going to hold of issuing the IETF LC, however, until it can
be done together with draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm.   That way, any
edits made to that draft in response to recent comments can be reflected in
this draft, and the two can go to LC together.

One other note: I'm not sure that HMAC-SHA1 is still something that we want
new specifications to refer to (as opposed to, say, HMAC-SHA256).  But I
will defer to the SECDIR reviewers on this question.

Thanks,
--Richard