Re: [AVT] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-smpte-rtp-01.txt
Dave Singer <singer@apple.com> Wed, 22 February 2006 19:15 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBzST-00016F-De; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:15:29 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBzSR-00015o-Pe for avt@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:15:27 -0500
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com ([17.254.13.23]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBzSQ-0001VG-FR for avt@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:15:27 -0500
Received: from relay6.apple.com (relay6.apple.com [17.128.113.36]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1MJFPi9025413 for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:15:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [17.202.35.52] (singda.apple.com [17.202.35.52]) by relay6.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 9D3F924E for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:15:25 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06230944c02267cd005a@[17.202.35.52]>
In-Reply-To: <E1F7LY1-0001Xu-UP@newodin.ietf.org>
References: <E1F7LY1-0001Xu-UP@newodin.ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:13:20 -0800
To: avt@ietf.org
From: Dave Singer <singer@apple.com>
Subject: Re: [AVT] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-smpte-rtp-01.txt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: avt-bounces@ietf.org
In this I-D, there are still a couple of open questions. I'm wondering if any on the list can indicate their preferences, or whether the editor should make his best guess. Would people like more background info (e.g. the 6 flag bits and 8 4-bit binary groups documentation)? * * * * * Open question: should we normally compute framespersecond from frameduration? Open question: should we allow for a full 8-byte SMPTE time-code formatted exactly as in SMPTE 12M? We are currently missing the 6 flag bits and the 8 4-bit binary groups. -- David Singer Apple Computer/QuickTime _______________________________________________ Audio/Video Transport Working Group avt@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
- [AVT] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-smpte-rtp-01.txt Internet-Drafts
- Re: [AVT] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-smpte-rtp-01.… Dave Singer
- [AVT] Carrying SMPTE TimeCode in RTP Dave Singer
- Re: [AVT] Carrying SMPTE TimeCode in RTP Colin Perkins
- Re: [AVT] Carrying SMPTE TimeCode in RTP Chuck Harrison
- Re: [AVT] Carrying SMPTE TimeCode in RTP Dave Singer
- Re: [AVT] Carrying SMPTE TimeCode in RTP Magnus Westerlund
- [AVT] Carrying SMPTE TimeCode in RTP, summary Dave Singer