Re: [AVT] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-01.txt

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Wed, 05 November 2008 12:37 UTC

Return-Path: <avt-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: avt-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-avt-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688A33A699A; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 04:37:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAAD3A699A for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 04:37:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rs0nvqkMMr-S for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 04:37:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mr1.dcs.gla.ac.uk (mr1.dcs.gla.ac.uk [130.209.249.184]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72AD3A691A for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 04:37:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mangole.dcs.gla.ac.uk ([130.209.247.112]:52266) by mr1.dcs.gla.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.42) id 1KxhdJ-0000fJ-BF for avt@ietf.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:37:13 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
In-Reply-To: <20081104201501.3217628C28A@core3.amsl.com>
References: <20081104201501.3217628C28A@core3.amsl.com>
Message-Id: <41C2F9F2-8608-4EDB-B9BF-C7CDF2CFCF12@csperkins.org>
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:10:26 +0000
To: IETF AVT WG <avt@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
Subject: Re: [AVT] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-01.txt
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: avt-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: avt-bounces@ietf.org

On 4 Nov 2008, at 20:15, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport Working  
> Group of the IETF.
>
> 	Title		: Why RTP Does Not Mandate a Single Security Mechanism
> 	Author(s)	: C. Perkins, M. Westerlund
> 	Filename	: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-01.txt
> 	Pages		: 10
> 	Date		: 2008-11-4
> 	
> This memo discusses the problem of securing real-time multimedia
>    sessions, and explains why the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP)
>    does not mandate a single media security mechanism.
>
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not- 
> mandatory-01.txt


Just minor changes with this, mostly clarifying references. I think  
it's probably ready for WG last call - comments welcome.

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/



_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt