Re: [AVTCORE] Errata on RFC 5764 (Errata 3913)

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Fri, 30 January 2015 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE0B1A8A87 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 01:50:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K4ocLD-7L3Nr for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 01:50:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF93A1A8A85 for <avt@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 01:50:31 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79fc6d000001087-1a-54cb53e5e15e
Received: from ESESSHC023.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id B7.4C.04231.5E35BC45; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 10:50:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.195.1; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 10:50:29 +0100
Message-ID: <54CB53E4.8060300@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 10:50:28 +0100
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
References: <87pp9xgfgl.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
In-Reply-To: <87pp9xgfgl.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje7T4NMhBifWWlu87FnJbvHyRJkD k8fk/V+ZPZYs+ckUwBTFZZOSmpNZllqkb5fAlXFi5R7GgvsCFTfvb2NrYGzj7WLk5JAQMJFo fTyHEcIWk7hwbz1bFyMXh5DAEUaJ1S0bmSGc5YwSt1f9B6viFdCWWDnzDzOIzSKgKvHm1n82 EJtNwELi5o9GMFtUIFhi8fOnrBD1ghInZz5h6WLk4BAR0JToWJADEmYGWty3C2KMsIC5xOuG vSwgtpCAkcS0ba/B4pwCxhLLPy5jhKg3kDiyaA4rhC0v0bx1NjNEvbZEQ1MH6wRGwVlIts1C 0jILScsCRuZVjKLFqcXFuelGxnqpRZnJxcX5eXp5qSWbGIHBenDLb90djKtfOx5iFOBgVOLh 3fD5VIgQa2JZcWXuIUZpDhYlcV4740MhQgLpiSWp2ampBalF8UWlOanFhxiZODilGhhTH89d 9tVsm2Pt93efwl0Cg07McvvLHfvtJv+TSUUhCxyfi8olCTJt1M/Rvc9+fcbcxfVPfqv/v5Jf uCPcbsr0778ztQ/2Xnuc8mHm6mYTlps5K6bUbNZTN1Fp2nwocEeocTn7vfL61iUZfqtMly+b NeuGHUP3aek4u+zVjy+ntVU9qpX2TFZQYinOSDTUYi4qTgQAMW0kLzcCAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/QBAUlMjc9rnJBhYU0UjxbddngOM>
Cc: avt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Errata on RFC 5764 (Errata 3913)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 09:50:34 -0000

On 2015-01-30 03:38, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> writes:
>> I think a reasonable handling of this one would
>> be to put it into the "Held for Documents Update" category.
> 
> This makes sense to me, but I think the following sentence is not as
> informative as it needs to be:  "STUN messages with methods identifiers
> of 1280 or higher cannot be demultiplexed."  The statement should tell
> what happens, e.g., "STUN messages with method identifiers of 1280 or
> higher are indistinguishable from ***, so such method identifiers must
> be avoided when ***."
> 

Sounds good, if we prepare a replacement for the note, I believe the AD
can edit the Errata.


OLD NEW Text:

Arriving packets may be of types RTP, DTLS, or STUN [RFC5389].
STUN messages with methods identifiers of 1280 or higher cannot
be demultiplexed.
...
                   |       B < 20  -+--> forward to STUN
...
If the value of this byte is less than 20, then the packet is STUN.


New NEW Text:
Arriving packets may be of types RTP, DTLS, or STUN [RFC5389].
STUN messages with method identifiers of 1280 or higher are
indistinguishable from DTLS so such method identifiers must
be avoided when multiplexing the protocols on the same 5-tuple.
...
                   |       B < 20  -+--> forward to STUN
...
If the value of this byte is less than 20, then the packet is STUN.


END OF CHANGE

I also note that one potential critique to accepting it in the current
form, is the issue Cullen raised if we really should assign all of the
0-19 space to STUN or keep that space more limited.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                 | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------