Re: [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3611 (4597)
Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Mon, 04 April 2016 17:24 UTC
Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A4512D158 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cP9bCd-O9bwU for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 683A912D115 for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79c06d000005960-05-5702a35fbfc0
Received: from ESESSHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.39]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F3.87.22880.F53A2075; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 19:24:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 19:24:46 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
To: alan@telchemy.com, timur.friedman@lip6.fr, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com, roni.even@mail01.huawei.com
References: <20160122061024.2C4AA18046C@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <5702A356.1090900@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:24:38 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160122061024.2C4AA18046C@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7um78YqZwg9W7FS2u3etnt5h+5i+j xcuelewW8ztPs1s8bTzLaPGk5QezxboDf1ks7szYwe7A4bF4xRRWj9Zne1k9vjx5yeSxZMlP Jo+9W7I8dmx+wOoxa+cTFo9j888xBnBEcdmkpOZklqUW6dslcGUc29vAWtAgUrGg7yZTA+N9 /i5GTg4JAROJTbtms0PYYhIX7q1n62Lk4hASOMIo8ejDXSYIZxmjxJIfj5hAqtgELCRu/mhk A7GFBcwlDtybyAhSJCIwj1Hi6CcQhwOow1xi16kYkBpmAVWJHZPXMIPYvALaEi+PHwezWQRU JM6/+gu2WVQgRuL4u3OMEDWCEidnPmEBsTmBdm3q+cACMpJZwF7iwdYyiJHyEs1bZ4ONEQIa 2dDUwTqBUXAWku5ZCB2zkHQsYGRexShanFpcnJtuZKyXWpSZXFycn6eXl1qyiREYIwe3/Nbd wbj6teMhRgEORiUe3gWnGMOFWBPLiitzDzFKcDArifBKLWAKF+JNSaysSi3Kjy8qzUktPsQo zcGiJM6bE/kvTEggPbEkNTs1tSC1CCbLxMEp1cDIU/gmwm7GQd1Or7pTKb/fMwo+mMyn8rz3 4BWzghP5FenXokw1HNZVdfK4H6jsMBeyWe/14cvlw+JKIX9L2n/ucZj9+cTxyvz9+66/8Ldp Trukbvfes+bOEjN7c+fTp71to39Yn5jyomtL2aYD9zZN+nT9/21BLZWthROv1CVMXR4juXJK g0O5EktxRqKhFnNRcSIAZNdAuY0CAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/QQzKO9LYZoQVOEqPyaEdEOZ2g1k>
Cc: avt@ietf.org, timebow@163.com
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3611 (4597)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 17:24:52 -0000
Hi, I have looked at this errata. It appears to be correct. I checked Liu's calculation and get the same value. I think the reason the wrong value is in the RFC is due that the authors calculated the 33% loss value and used that to calculate the burst density, rather than 4/12s. As this can be confusing when implementing I propose that we verify this Errata. Please provide any feedback on this proposal no later than the 18th of April. Cheers Magnus Westerlund Den 2016-01-22 kl. 03:10, skrev RFC Errata System: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3611, > "RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3611&eid=4597 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Liu Yuanlong <timebow@163.com> > > Section: 4.7.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > burst density 84, which corresponds to 33% > > Corrected Text > -------------- > burst density 85, which corresponds to 33% > > Notes > ----- > error calculation for burst density, burst density=4/12*256=85.33...≈85 > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC3611 (draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-report-extns-06) > -------------------------------------- > Title : RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) > Publication Date : November 2003 > Author(s) : T. Friedman, Ed., R. Caceres, Ed., A. Clark, Ed. > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Audio/Video Transport > Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > -- Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3611 (45… RFC Errata System
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3611… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3611… Alan Clark
- [AVTCORE] [Errata Verified] RFC3611 (4597) RFC Errata System