[AVTCORE] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message-08: (with COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 22 September 2020 07:43 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietf.org
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877D23A14AE; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message@ietf.org, avtcore-chairs@ietf.org, avt@ietf.org, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, bernard.aboba@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.17.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <160076061909.10978.10005825889375833839@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:43:39 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/S4FhtmdgvgDd-h_IueF801q7uqQ>
Subject: [AVTCORE] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 07:43:40 -0000
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. Please find below a couple of non-blocking COMMENT points and nits. I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric == COMMENTS == -- Section 3.1 -- In "but overlapping reports MAY be sent (and need to be sent in cases" should the "need" be a "MUST" ? -- Section 5 -- In "then the sender SHOULD rapidly reduce", "sender" is somehow ambiguous: is it the feedback transmitter or the media source sender ? -- Section 6 -- The mandatory use of "*" appears strange to the non-SDP expert (like myself). Why transmitting something that is always identical? What is the value ? == NITS == -- Section 3.1 -- As some reader may also wonder like me, why the use of 'L' (at least I am puzzled)? why not giving one word mnemonic to explain the logic behind this choice ? -- Section 7 -- Is there a typo in ""a=ecn-capaable-rtp:"" ? it is probably redundant to again expand ECN.
- [AVTCORE] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-iet… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [AVTCORE] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft… Colin Perkins
- Re: [AVTCORE] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)