IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AVTCORE] Multi-party real-time text requiring new RTP payload type

worley@ariadne.com Fri, 24 April 2020 01:23 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FCD3A0CCD for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 18:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcastmailservice.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a1W4rYEDhRBy for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 18:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4794C3A0CD3 for <avtcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 18:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-18v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.114]) by resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id RmzSjzRnLhhLnRn3MjwWFN; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 01:22:52 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcastmailservice.net; s=20180828_2048; t=1587691372; bh=c/m8Gxmvx7o9EqkBhkv9BobFeMVmcK0qynX2D721cpU=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=oI3k+q7amkQ+aKXN/4bjLdHmwUT0fS6vnyYFIxa1+mLxFRHXfXtcVlATxsP5wfQYN ZmW1RYWbO9rjJTHNEIRQecZZ5iQU4TSyfI2DqJyr9RtM/ZZEBT4S/m9iR+wQPGOo4d giOR8rSprChcp1uJyFz/pDy548mDkiINm/5Ec3StX0koj8z4Sn5aeK47exv8u8Tpq3 7GyhTISKN35uDgdrCQGx1uWBAmuh8PFAlqpsA1UmqYu6rBBowVtREIEiSk6EH80F5N 6apD/4LhzFpGLyLRh5MPZZ9edtZS4lvwkVcwaUsgd3CVrsGX3bjnGaaWEFCRuhLant n3HIW8jVxWKmg==
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([IPv6:2601:192:4a00:430:222:fbff:fe91:d396]) by resomta-ch2-18v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id Rn3JjnpRuC5ukRn3KjsnLq; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 01:22:51 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=-100.00;st=legit
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 03O1MnZF017893; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 21:22:49 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id 03O1MmHZ017890; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 21:22:48 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@ghaccess.se>
Cc: avtcore@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <8cec232d-1341-9d33-447a-49263c550a92@ghaccess.se> (gunnar.hellstrom@ghaccess.se)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 21:22:48 -0400
Message-ID: <87y2qlu17b.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/SQoYJySTZC_Ej103qQ134XBfG6g>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Multi-party real-time text requiring new RTP payload type
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 01:23:07 -0000

Gunnar Hellstr\"om <gunnar.hellstrom@ghaccess.se> writes:
> Thanks, a good question. It is the right time to consider which source 
> multiplexing and reliability method to select, now when we need to 
> introduce a new negotiation.

My idea wasn't that I had any better idea, but rather that there were
some obvious ideas, and clearly, people who had studied the matter found
that the obvious ideas were not the best.  What I really meant was that
it would be useful to give brief documentation why the obvious ideas
aren't best.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email