RE: [AVT] pre-submission of rtp payload for atrac-family

"Even, Roni" <roni.even@polycom.co.il> Thu, 22 January 2004 07:54 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA12560 for <avt-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:54:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AjZfB-0006z0-55 for avt-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:54:06 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0M7s5QE026795 for avt-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:54:05 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AjZf7-0006xc-0V; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:54:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AjZem-0006x4-Le for avt@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:53:40 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA12552 for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:53:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AjZei-0005BD-00 for avt@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:53:36 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AjZdm-0005AI-00 for avt@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:52:38 -0500
Received: from 212.199.61.2.forward.012.net.il ([212.199.61.2] helo=accord-mail.israel.polycom.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AjZdc-00059G-00 for avt@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:52:28 -0500
Received: by accord-mail.israel.polycom.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <ZGXV8F43>; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:51:57 +0200
Message-ID: <E173F9D0511CA94581BC3FA62F06848D07B3E9@accord-mail.israel.polycom.com>
From: "Even, Roni" <roni.even@polycom.co.il>
To: 'Matthew Romaine' <Matthew.Romaine@jp.sony.com>, avt@ietf.org
Cc: Mitsuyuki Hatanaka <hatanaka@av.crl.sony.co.jp>, Jun Matsumoto <jun@av.crl.sony.co.jp>
Subject: RE: [AVT] pre-submission of rtp payload for atrac-family
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:51:57 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Sender: avt-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: avt-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

Hi,
A small question, I did not see any reference in the draft for the codec
itself, is it a publicly available codec
Thanks
Roni Even

*************************************
Roni Even

Polycom Israel

Tel: +972-3-9251200
Cell: +972-55-481099
email:roni.even@polycom.co.il
*******************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Romaine [mailto:Matthew.Romaine@jp.sony.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 5:34 AM
To: avt@ietf.org
Cc: Mitsuyuki Hatanaka; Jun Matsumoto
Subject: [AVT] pre-submission of rtp payload for atrac-family



Hello avt groupers (particularly Colin and Magnus),

I have attached an rtp payload format for the ATRAC family of audio 
codecs Sony has been developing.  Some of you may be familiar with the 
ATRAC-X payload we were working on last year.  With a bit of guidance 
from Mangus, we have decided to considerably simplify the payload, 
while at the same time generalize it so that previous ATRAC codecs, 
which are still widely used, could be included.

As I seek comments from listers on what needs to be fixed and 
clarified, I have a question about the naming convention.  Must we 
treat this as a completely new payload format (-00), which would mean 
committing to an earlier deadline, or can we consider this a continued 
revision of previous submissions (making this a -04)?

Please fire away with comments.

Thanks,
Matt



_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt