[AVTCORE] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Lars Eggert via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip-05: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# GEN AD review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip-05

CC @larseggert

Thanks to Stewart Bryant for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/UqpTwkxRsJyLZHQA9FAqx8R0z4o)

# Discuss

I don't think this document should be published on the Standards Track
without a normative reference to [SCIP210], and without that document
being made available in some form during IETF review.

If [SCIP210] cannot be made available, a way forward might be to publish
this specification as an Informational RFC and to add explicit text about
the limited review it has hence received by the IETF.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

## Nits

All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to
address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool) so there
will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you
did with these suggestions.

### Grammar/style

#### Section 5.3, paragraph 9
```
TP in general. This responsibility lays on anyone using RTP in an application
                                   ^^^^^^^
```
Did you mean "lies on"?

## Notes

This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the
[`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into
individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT].

[ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md
[ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments
[IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool