Re: [AVT] Syncronization of co-located clients?

lazzaro <lazzaro@eecs.berkeley.edu> Mon, 04 July 2005 01:11 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DpFUM-00070R-2F; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:11:10 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DpFUK-00070M-D2 for avt@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:11:08 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA02467 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 21:11:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from gateway0.eecs.berkeley.edu ([169.229.60.93]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DpFun-0007yj-4Q for avt@ietf.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:38:30 -0400
Received: from [128.32.34.73] (dhcp-34-73.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.34.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by gateway0.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j641Ave2004999 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 18:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <844C1EF2-9904-454F-A92C-697B259EA6F9@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
To: avt@ietf.org
From: lazzaro <lazzaro@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: [AVT] Syncronization of co-located clients?
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 18:11:28 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: avt-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: avt-bounces@ietf.org

Stephen Casner <casner at acm.org> writes:
> I don't think the SMPTE timecodes help unless they are representing an
> absolute time in the future, where the sender has made a prediction
> about the amount of time needed for propagation to all receivers and
> buffering time within each receiver.  That might work in a controlled
> LAN environment, but it is not a general solution.

I think it might make sense to revisit the ideas in the BBN protocol,
but start with the latency model of a modern wired and wireless LAN,
and define a simplified protocol for this special case.  Zeroconf is
an example of a protocol that limited itself to "networking in the  
small"
and was very successful, and I think speaker synchronization could
be just as successful ...

---
John Lazzaro
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~lazzaro
lazzaro [at] cs [dot] berkeley [dot] edu
---



_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt