RE: [AVT] Inquiry about RFC 4629 (optional parameters in SDP)
"Even, Roni" <roni.even@polycom.co.il> Tue, 04 September 2007 17:17 UTC
Return-path: <avt-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISc1p-0006eq-08; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:17:29 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISc1n-0006eR-Al for avt@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:17:27 -0400
Received: from fw.polycom.co.il ([212.179.41.2] helo=isrexch01.israel.polycom.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISc1l-00073B-Bb for avt@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:17:27 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [AVT] Inquiry about RFC 4629 (optional parameters in SDP)
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:18:43 +0300
Message-ID: <144ED8561CE90C41A3E5908EDECE315C04DE8340@IsrExch01.israel.polycom.com>
In-Reply-To: <30C65F3A3407B943826897E025135BE6E6EA2B659D@DF-GRTDANE-MSG.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [AVT] Inquiry about RFC 4629 (optional parameters in SDP)
Thread-Index: Acfur6ZGVEANEHQiQ9Kj+olL8t5qHwAZ6Yfw
From: "Even, Roni" <roni.even@polycom.co.il>
To: Regis Crinon <regisc@exchange.microsoft.com>, avt@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 748ed3980abc7d4bd6a14905626ff64e
Cc:
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0867678178=="
Errors-To: avt-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, The reason for this selection of annexes was based on the ones being used by products in the markets. There is no need to specify parameters that are not used. You can also use annex X based profiles for specifying other application based profile. Roni Even !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A consensus means that everyone agrees to say collectively what no one believes individually !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ________________________________ From: Regis Crinon [mailto:regisc@exchange.microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 7:54 AM To: avt@ietf.org Subject: [AVT] Inquiry about RFC 4629 (optional parameters in SDP) Hello everyone, I have the following question regarding RFC 4629. I would really appreciate your feedback. Thank you in advance, Regis J. Crinon Fact 1: H.263+ includes a set of new Annexes: Annex I through T. Fact 2: RFC 4629 account for ONLY a subset of these annexes. See excerpts from the RFC below: A list of optional annexes specifies which annexes of H.263 are supported. The optional annexes are defined as part of H263-1998, H263-2000. H.263 annex X [H263] defines profiles that group annexes for specific applications. A system that supports a specific annex SHALL specify its support using the optional parameters. If no annex is specified, then the stream is Baseline H.263. The allowed optional parameters for the annexes are "F", "I", "J", "T", "K", "N", and "P". Question How are the other annexes signaled? Example: How can I signal that an H.263+ bistream uses Annex L or Annex M or Annex O or Annex Q or Annex R or Annex S? It seems that I cannot use SDP to tell a video bitstream that uses one or more of these annexes from one that does not. Hence the question.
_______________________________________________ Audio/Video Transport Working Group avt@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
- [AVT] Inquiry about RFC 4629 (optional parameters… Regis Crinon
- RE: [AVT] Inquiry about RFC 4629 (optional parame… Even, Roni
- Re: [AVT] Inquiry about RFC 4629 (optional parame… Randell Jesup
- RE: [AVT] Inquiry about RFC 4629 (optional parame… Even, Roni
- Re: [AVT] Inquiry about RFC 4629 (optional parame… Randell Jesup
- Re: [AVT] Inquiry about RFC 4629 (optional parame… Carsten Bormann