[AVTCORE] Holding draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream in Auth48 waiting for references

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Thu, 31 March 2016 07:02 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CB512D851 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PKRogtNAVgdZ for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 234B712D821 for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f79f86d00000400a-29-56fccb9b19b6
Received: from ESESSHC009.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.45]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 61.D9.16394.B9BCCF65; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:02:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:02:50 +0200
To: IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <56FCCB9A.8050401@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:02:50 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7ru7s03/CDM58kLJ42bOS3WJ+52l2 iyctP5gdmD2WLPnJ5LFj8wNWj1k7n7AEMEdx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZbR17WEueC5QcX3+fcYG xie8XYycHBICJhIrf85gg7DFJC7cWw9kc3EICRxhlHh86gkzhLOcUWLCwX3MIFUiAkoSOyZt A7I5OJgFvCWmTY0ECbMJWEjc/NEINkhYIFzi+MZWVhCbV0BbYt+s2ewg5SwCqhLrvueChEUF YiSOvzvHCFEiKHFy5hMWiIn2Eg+2loGEmQXkJZq3zgZbKgQ0paGpg3UCI/8sJB2zEDpmIelY wMi8ilG0OLU4KTfdyFgvtSgzubg4P08vL7VkEyMwGA9u+a26g/HyG8dDjAIcjEo8vAta/oQJ sSaWFVfmHmKU4GBWEuF9dgwoxJuSWFmVWpQfX1Sak1p8iFGag0VJnJf10+UwIYH0xJLU7NTU gtQimCwTB6dUA2Ptu+7Hp7NynrIcmsfEdJilqfj+1KTbs5OWfI+sZUzQbP7TOUWjvZLn0OfZ RzX+GHzOKmpr0ZqjLpbzpXPz4pzHIRu3TVRu49O7kqh779OlJdzGX3lkFz39+ClnVzDH+a0T +vK3mfzR0dRZmH/vW93D5YXf7zafvVb8knnakZ/Gz5qkPzkzZexTYinOSDTUYi4qTgQAucnY zEICAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/XyjmZxiTyBh0oq-BjUqha0hFOzg>
Subject: [AVTCORE] Holding draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream in Auth48 waiting for references
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:02:55 -0000

WG,

This is written as one of the authors of 
draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream. We are currently in AUTH48 and are 
mostly done with our reviews. However, we have come to the conclusion 
that we have a number of important informational references in this 
document to its sibling documents. These documents are:

draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation: The optimization for 
reporting when having multiple SSRCs per endpoint. We think this is the 
most important reference as it is so closely tied.

draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-media-rtp-session is one of the motivating 
usages for why this clarification is needed. Thus good to get a proper 
reference to its RFC rather than a draft name.

draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation is much less important from 
this document context, however it is anyway a normative reference for 
draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation and will thus be 
available if we wait for the optimization one.

We authors think it would be really good to have these reference as RFCs 
rather than drafts. Thus our proposal is to actually hold the 
publication of this document until the time all three of the above can 
be published.

Thus our question to the WG is two fold. Are there anyone that will have 
a significant issue with holding the publication of this document until 
the above documents are available? Considering that the AVTCORE ones 
already are in the RFC-editor queue, the blocking document that we need 
to wait for is draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation. The second 
question is if people agree with us that it would be good to hold the 
publication?

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                 | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------