RE: [AVT] TR: I-D ACTION:draft-sollaud-avt-rtp-g729-scal-wb-ext-01.txt

Figured it was EV. My point was that there are multiple alternatives for EV 
that are still in play, as noted in the document list I distributed 
earlier. So my question was "which of those alternatives (for EV)" does 
your draft relate to? (I'm guessing its France Telecom's proposal, but one 
can never be sure. ;-) )

Keith

At 01:08 AM 7/26/2005, SOLLAUD Aurelien RD-TECH-LAN wrote:
>It concerns the G.729-based embedded variable bit rate extension to G.729 
>(G729EV). I called it X in the draft because the final corresponding annex 
>letter is still not determined.
>
>The other big ITU current work on G.729 is about annex B (VAD and silence 
>suppresion) and is not related to the proposed RTP payload format.
>
>Aurelien
>
>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Keith Lantz [mailto:klantz@cisco.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 26 juillet 2005 02:29
>À : SOLLAUD Aurelien RD-TECH-LAN
>Cc : zzx-IETF-AVT
>Objet : Re: [AVT] TR: I-D 
>ACTION:draft-sollaud-avt-rtp-g729-scal-wb-ext-01.txt
>
>I deleted your response to the query below, but ... Having now reviewed 
>the list of contributions to the current ITU sessions related to G.729 
>(see the attached list), I've gotta ask: Which of the many enhancements 
>still under consideration does this payload format refer to?
>
>Regards, Keith
>
>At 08:51 AM 7/18/2005, Keith Lantz wrote:
> >Per the earlier "debate" on this list re VC-1, could you distribute or
> >otherwise point people at the current draft for the "G.729X" spec?
> >(Unlike SMPTE, I've never heard anyone object to distribution of an ITU
> >draft.)
> >
> >Thx, Keith
> >
> >At 01:43 AM 7/18/2005, SOLLAUD Aurelien RD-TECH-LAN wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I posted a -01 update of the RTP payload format for the future
> >>scalable and wideband extension of G.729 audio codec.
> >>
> >>The major update is a simplification of the payload format. The
> >>payload header is no more optional and hence the (tricky)
> >>acknowledgement procedure has been removed. I added more spec on the 
> MBS part.
> >>The implementation should be now much easier.
> >>
> >>Note that the ITU-T standardization of the codec is on schedule, it
> >>should be delivered at the end of 2005.
> >>
> >>Comments are welcome.
> >>
> >>Aurelien
> >>
> >>-----Message d'origine-----
> >>De : i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org
> >>[mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org]
> >>De la part de Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Envoyé : jeudi 14 juillet 2005
> >>21:50 À : i-d-announce@ietf.org Objet : I-D
> >>ACTION:draft-sollaud-avt-rtp-g729-scal-wb-ext-01.txt
> >>
> >>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> >>directories.
> >>
> >>
> >>         Title           : RTP payload format for the future scalable and
> >>                           wideband extension of G.729 audio codec
> >>         Author(s)       : A. Sollaud
> >>         Filename        : draft-sollaud-avt-rtp-g729-scal-wb-ext-01.txt
> >>         Pages           : 15
> >>         Date            : 2005-7-14
> >>
> >>This document specifies a real-time transport protocol (RTP) payload
> >>    format to be used for the future scalable and wideband extension of
> >>    the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T) G.729 audio codec.
> >>    A media type registration is included for this payload format.
> >>
> >>A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> >>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sollaud-avt-rtp-g729-scal-wb
> >>-ext-01.txt
> >>

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt