IETF Logo Mail Archive

[AVTCORE] Re: Errata on RFC 8888 - number of reports

Jonathan Lennox <lennox@cs.columbia.edu> Tue, 19 November 2024 19:33 UTC

Return-Path: <lennox@cs.columbia.edu>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32475C1D4A93 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:33:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.245
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.245 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.355, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XBRJSuist2Me for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:33:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BC2FC1D876D for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:33:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute02.cs.columbia.edu (compute02.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.32]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4XtF5c2FQRz4NS7 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:33:08 -0500 (EST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <26428.59380.6291.274082@compute02.cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:33:08 -0500
From: Jonathan Lennox <lennox@cs.columbia.edu>
To: IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <1c6a3b7b-a292-46cd-8baf-77828022abaf@alvestrand.no>
References: <1c6a3b7b-a292-46cd-8baf-77828022abaf@alvestrand.no>
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Message-ID-Hash: DE3XCGVA26M6KB6DWHYBAMU75PTXBEE3
X-Message-ID-Hash: DE3XCGVA26M6KB6DWHYBAMU75PTXBEE3
X-MailFrom: lennox@cs.columbia.edu
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-avt.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [AVTCORE] Re: Errata on RFC 8888 - number of reports
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/Yxrs2NUJRh9vHx75JTtjFfvMn18>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:avt-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:avt-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:avt-leave@ietf.org>

The suggested fix in the errata report looks like the correct fix to me.
I'm 99% sure that's the way I implemented it when I was doing it in the
Hackathon, too (sadly, in closed source at my previous employer).

On Tuesday, November 19 2024, "Harald Alvestrand" wrote to "IETF AVTCore WG" saying:

> This was discovered during interop testing at IETF 121, but hasn't hit 
> the list yet as far as I can see.
> 
> Report:
> 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8166
> 
> Basically, there are two ways to interpret how many packets to report on 
> in a feedback message, and Netflix and Chrome had chosen incompatible 
> interpreations.
> 
> Can we settle this one way or the other?
> 
> Harald

-- 
Jonathan Lennox
lennox@cs.columbia.edu

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status