Re: [AVTCORE] WGLC on draft-ietf-avtcore-ecn-for-rtp-04

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Wed, 19 October 2011 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD49921F8CE8 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.228
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.370, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wjjYxR2B8lm9 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B0321F8CDD for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; l=592; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1319041519; x=1320251119; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date: message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5T7BBtfwqJs55msMl2t2Td+heq9QiDsiVwDFgOuVpXE=; b=MtHkZKIL4TY8KPOYmjfIvgMZpW3o0vEtDvSFab4qh4lTWoA4CTJxOpkv gPbFEEGr4tgQi/P7bKpny7pgs0T/5VOcS3I4wb2dlyrOlUnF/2w0Sb4aK VkGieulnF5eN9dfPm3rq5LDgvVkl2+zCRL+d0iiwM3vJoaPBRow8AOQ3W A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EADn5nk6rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABEmzCNRIEFgW4BAQEECAoBFxA/DQMCCQ83GSMbAQEEHhefCQGeTIgbBIgCnXM
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,373,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="8909934"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Oct 2011 16:25:19 +0000
Received: from dwingWS ([10.32.240.198]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9JGPG2T017429; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:25:18 GMT
From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
To: "'Magnus Westerlund'" <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
References: <016101cc7f6c$9795e380$c6c1aa80$%roni@huawei.com> <008b01cc89ce$724dee80$56e9cb80$@com> <4E9EDC19.2000707@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E9EDC19.2000707@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:25:18 -0700
Message-ID: <0b5d01cc8e7b$b106b470$13141d50$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcyOaeynmZ0L0S2HTwq5+GYqJGxduwAEQ8gg
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: draft-ietf-avtcore-ecn-for-rtp@tools.ietf.org, avt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] WGLC on draft-ietf-avtcore-ecn-for-rtp-04
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:25:19 -0000

...
> Secondly, I think the optimization you propose is good and I think we
> can accept it with the note that I would like much more conservative
> ECN
> STUN check transmission schedule if we are going to do media in
> parallel.
> 
> However, this is an substantiative change so I would like to see if
> there is WG support for it.

With the years-long bru-hah-hah of ICE being misunderstood for "delaying
call set up", it seems important for the success of ECN RTP to ensure
it does not suffer that same fate.  That would delay/prevent ECN RTP's
widespread deployment.

-d