Re: [AVT] RTP over TCP.

"Peter Westerink" <> Tue, 14 May 2002 20:05 UTC

Received: from ( [] (may be forged)) by (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA03967 for <>; Tue, 14 May 2002 16:05:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id QAA18897 for; Tue, 14 May 2002 16:06:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from (localhost []) by (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA18822; Tue, 14 May 2002 16:05:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from (odin []) by (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA18771 for <>; Tue, 14 May 2002 16:05:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ( []) by (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA03946; Tue, 14 May 2002 16:05:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ( []) by (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4EK4XAH223348; Tue, 14 May 2002 16:04:46 -0400
Received: from ( []) by (8.11.1m3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g4EK4Ul123106; Tue, 14 May 2002 16:04:31 -0400
Subject: Re: [AVT] RTP over TCP.
To: Ram Kordale <>
Cc:,, Ross Finlayson <>,
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001
Message-ID: <>
From: Peter Westerink <>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 16:03:01 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML243/01/M/IBM(Release 5.0.10 |March 22, 2002) at 05/14/2002 04:04:30 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <>


I believe such a profile existed in draft-ietf-avt-profile-new-09.txt, but
it was removed in version 10 because "there were no 2 implementations".
There were no technical reasons mentioned. The draft proposed prepending
each RTP packet with a 2-byte length and that's all.

IBM is interested in the same thing you're after, and I can assume there
are more MPEG-4 companies that also would want to send their BIFS and OD
streams reliably (albeit not guaranteed on-time) over TCP. With that we
should be able to come up with 2 implementations and hence re-instate the


                      Ram Kordale                                                                                           
                      <kordale@kasenna.        To:       Ross Finlayson <>                                
                      com>                     cc:       <>,                                
                      Sent by:                 Subject:  Re: [AVT] RTP over TCP.                                            
                      05/14/2002 03:50                                                                                      


Section 10.12 describes only the interleaving case. What about the case
where RTP and RTCP data need to be transferred on separate TCP connections?

This will need a separate profile. Does such a profile exist?


At 12:17 PM 5/8/2002 -0700, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>At 10:45 AM 5/8/02, Ethen Bommaiah wrote:
>>I was curious to know if there were any standard profiles that define
>>transferring RTP
>>packets over TCP. In particular, we were interested in transferring RTP
>>over TCP
>>while using RTSP as the control protocol.
>Yes - see section 10.12 of the RTSP specification (RFC 2326).  This
>defines how RTP packets may be carried over the RTSP (TCP) stream.  (This
>is actually not a new RTP 'profile', but instead, an optonal mechanism
>defined within RTSP.)
>         Ross.
>Audio/Video Transport Working Group

Audio/Video Transport Working Group

Audio/Video Transport Working Group