Re: [AVTCORE] [payload] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4733 (3489)

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Thu, 18 April 2013 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291D021F8E94; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 01:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.069
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.069 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.180, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q7JDoyIhjfia; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 01:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D6221F8935; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 01:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f366d000004d10-38-516faa463c9a
Received: from esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 75.FF.19728.64AAF615; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:09:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [131.160.126.169] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:09:43 +0200
Message-ID: <516FAA45.2010005@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:09:41 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
References: <20130219074201.79BD0B1E002@rfc-editor.org> <515C42DD.1030902@ericsson.com> <516FA5AA.5080900@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <516FA5AA.5080900@ericsson.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra7bqvxAg6vHrC1e9qxkt3j1+gqr xaWLZ5ksLv1Tsbiw/heLA6vH11sHmTx2zrrL7tFy5C2rx5IlP5kCWKK4bFJSczLLUov07RK4 Mg5M28RUsE+24vamPYwNjBfFuxg5OSQETCSWPpjLDmGLSVy4t56ti5GLQ0jgFKPEq+W7GCGc tYwSU86uYgKp4hXQlnjz/g6YzSKgKvFi91E2EJtNwEJiy637LCC2qECUxL+3uxkh6gUlTs58 AhYXETCTeDhhP9gGZoFuRonTX6+CDRIW8JbYuvkDWIOQQLnE/3O/WUFsTgEdiX0v+6DOk5RY NK0TbBCzgJ7ElKstjBC2vMT2t3OYIXq1JZY/a2GZwCg0C8nuWUhaZiFpWcDIvIqRPTcxMye9 3GgTIzC8D275rbqD8c45kUOM0hwsSuK84a4XAoQE0hNLUrNTUwtSi+KLSnNSiw8xMnFwSjUw zkiZ987MbcYUgeDb3/Xfdmn+DfisoTBv+rtrG+zmtvK+7fhc/2An69Xy/XOOyq/jC1E9GCYf +bftfaNoUo37tpy3EpcnRx/PNp8979Sd6QfqA4z2/uDh/MB7fCXbywUJsvl6+ofMPA7s4Yh1 1P3/bbbO1LJXklIqrfutE3+/OWxms+TZj9t3NZVYijMSDbWYi4oTAYcM+uI9AgAA
Cc: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu, even.roni@huawei.com, avt@ietf.org, "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>, tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] [payload] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4733 (3489)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:09:45 -0000

Hi,

I have just verified it.

Thanks,

Gonzalo

On 18/04/2013 10:50 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> AD,
> 
> I recommend that you verify this errata as there has been no objection
> during this last call period and the text was developed in the context
> of the AVTCORE WG.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Magnus Westerlund
> as WG chair of AVTCORE WG
> 
> 
> On 2013-04-03 16:55, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
>> AVTCORE and Payload WG,
>>
>> There appear to exist an interoperability issue around the the need to
>> use the same timestamp rate for the DTMF and the audio. Thus, I think we
>> should serioulsy consider to approve this erratum. And if the text is
>> not correct, propose a better text.
>>
>> I personally believe the proposal is significantly clearer than the old
>> text and also reflect what must have been intended.
>>
>> This issues a 2-week last call on input on this erratum. After the 17th
>> of April I will issue a final recommendation on this erratum.
>>
>>
>> For previous discussion that resulted in this updated erratum proposal
>> see this AVTCORE mailing list discussion:
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/current/msg15669.html
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Magnus Westerlund
>> AVTCORE WG chair
>>
>> On 2013-02-19 08:42, RFC Errata System wrote:
>>>
>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4733,
>>> "RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones, and Telephony Signals".
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4733&eid=3489
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Type: Technical
>>> Reported by: Xavier Marjou <xavier.marjou@orange.com>
>>>
>>> Section: 2.1
>>>
>>> Original Text
>>> -------------
>>> Named telephone events are carried as part of the audio stream and MUST use the same sequence number and timestamp base as the regular audio channel to simplify the generation of audio waveforms at a gateway.
>>>
>>> Corrected Text
>>> --------------
>>> Named telephone events are carried as part of the audio stream and if they use the same SSRC (therefore the same timing and sequence number space), they MUST use the same timestamp clock rate as the regular audio channel.
>>>
>>> Notes
>>> -----
>>> RFC4733 was written in a way to avoid the multiple clock-rate problem by mandating the use of the same SSRC for DTMF and audio. However it's not explicitly written, which brings an ambiguity. It was commented that RFC4733 needs to be updated. (c.f. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/avtext/minutes?item=minutes-85-avtext.html). This errata obsoletes the previous proposed errata (ID: 3451).
>>>
>>> Instructions:
>>> -------------
>>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> RFC4733 (draft-ietf-avt-rfc2833bis-15)
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Title               : RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones, and Telephony Signals
>>> Publication Date    : December 2006
>>> Author(s)           : H. Schulzrinne, T. Taylor
>>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>> Source              : Audio/Video Transport
>>> Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
>>> Stream              : IETF
>>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
>>> avt@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
>