IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AVTCORE] WG Last Call: "RTP Payload Format for VP9 Video"

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Sun, 22 November 2020 22:24 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1CC3A0E5E for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:24:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i6QbAJSDh9H2 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:24:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 901D23A0E5D for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:24:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id y7so1053986lji.8 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:24:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6yFUIYdRZnLAXuE9U+VHCS6dzNzPPeeGvN8ONjg0cUk=; b=Z6nE+GmLcBhdg9k/r0YSnr1661OKaQO+TmBu5oMOcMkG3Js9RtEbQXQg2KVH3GJRQV uUzLGOwg9yLNLdi0L++QAuD2JSeF3ecPwlsy+oWpVLKUC+jdGO02k45gS5Q/HqTiy3p7 3nDivT7uuxHd/QbZgD1JheknRhqiy/c3vpOBY6VgL+ues9iWoQuVczL46lRGVYz/CuBk f767ca4bAXVGnRHI/keIVf9azW9SKdRlyFy89ukUCHbYvLwVOKMgQ/VhUZrIA/sHTuyv vGXTrzt5gyMcco4C4rrfVcQBqdpzpsVpW4BoqpTScrx3hmtMsLG3hM44BrP9JyGyiioe H9DA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=6yFUIYdRZnLAXuE9U+VHCS6dzNzPPeeGvN8ONjg0cUk=; b=sw0hjb8kfcRe8LwN6ibJUI7WCSWt7Q1zG37jKW8DJHJi7m8M5+9xTjq1w55dRgrYfk HMKFOvstbks2x0LxF5EELosgzCLv2n+BC2jzdxpr49cNA/55yXjyWATeirxYZnjJ0I30 eVHmvhgGLy/d7z71HOTFJUUcaq94Omtbs+kAUbDUlPPfBItG25cS8kKPmYh7eY90+RNe C6N2r0QYHuAepIzONYF/IrESkkRL90rh7kBvafa/sciB1oRY2R69bL8sIGwxVWhk0/+Q puLeYt7bsyI57WaNrx+w8H0qTwp5E/1DMpVjyDeBZTKMFZNNarwB5fXXUXDtXprRvafP mpZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AbHIThxvOHzrGxOOggjz0+NzWDk7nMiCqjR1eZqv0jYGrC+pG NuYS3aKDwt8pre6e8/LAtBpei9Dkos6Yz/SgFUqw5RUW+4uF3g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzivCUcRFpLo5AjGxF6MHkQ0x09kzR0RhKYEWSvZN2rnkBiHkqbO4h65jFlaOX4bTgHf3YB9H73AkIdPKZul9A=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b70d:: with SMTP id j13mr13139626ljo.240.1606083845614; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:24:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOW+2dvKjyjhOQrKbhFY87sB47ygAjK9RrtAXXomksNQh9R1Qw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOW+2dvKjyjhOQrKbhFY87sB47ygAjK9RrtAXXomksNQh9R1Qw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:23:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOW+2dsd563n6f0EbYn0EPROkSiEgwWqQ5swTMphLMfowVXxdA@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000018f3b705b4b98960"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/_b1ml3L2vJ1WCigGwGYf1mHCyUk>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] WG Last Call: "RTP Payload Format for VP9 Video"
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 22:24:09 -0000

While I support advancing "RTP Payload Format for VP9 Video" to Proposed
Standard, I did note an issue with Section 5.4, which I believe does not
accurately reflect implementation experience with framemarking:

The issue is filed here:
VP9: Framemarking not usable · Issue #118 · juberti/draughts (github.com)
<https://github.com/juberti/draughts/issues/118>

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 1:30 PM Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
wrote:

> This is an announcement of WG last call on "RTP Payload Format for VP9
> Video"
>
> Abstract
>
>    This memo describes an RTP payload format for the VP9 video codec.
>    The payload format has wide applicability, as it supports
>    applications from low bit-rate peer-to-peer usage, to high bit-rate
>    video conferences.  It includes provisions for temporal and spatial
>    scalability.
>
>
> The document is available for inspection here:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-payload-vp9
>
> The Github Repo for the document is here:
> https://github.com/juberti/draughts/issues
>
> WG Last Call will end on December 4, 2020.
>
> In response, please state one of the following:
>
> * I support advancing "RTP Payload Format for VP9 Video" to Proposed
> Standard
> * I object to advancing "RTP Payload Format for VP9 Video" to Proposed
> Standard, due to issues filed in open bug <#number>.
>
> Bernard Aboba
> For the Chairs
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email