IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AVTCORE] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-srtp-10: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 03 August 2017 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F201321C0; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 19:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GpfYZqEFePXF; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 19:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2717D129A96; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 19:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.63] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v732aVgX053591 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Aug 2017 21:36:32 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <150172505031.5791.14553211399724965332.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 21:36:31 -0500
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, avtcore-chairs@ietf.org, roni.even@huawei.com, draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-srtp@ietf.org, avt@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <084BEE4A-1241-42C6-BD39-36F11792ABB4@nostrum.com>
References: <150172505031.5791.14553211399724965332.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/aGnv-qTDato66EefrmpfITFN8ds>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-srtp-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 02:36:39 -0000



> On Aug 2, 2017, at 8:50 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Although this is not a discuss, I think updated text would be very helpful on
> the following two issues.
> 
> I agree with the SecDir reviewer that there should be more text around the
> short tag length in the security considerations section.  I don't see a
> response to that post though.
> 

Hi Kathleen,

I think you are referring to Ben Laurie’s SecDir review of 06, rather than his later review of 09. Is that correct? Version 9 removed the GCM_8 modes. Or were you referring to something else?

> For SHA-1, a reference to RFC6194 for the security considerations for
> SHA-1message digest algorithms would be helpful. Thank you!

Thanks, that’s helpful. I agree the security considerations needs to say something about the use of SHA1

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email