Re: [AVTCORE] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3611 (4386)

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Thu, 23 July 2015 08:57 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C54A1A86E4 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 01:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oVJm78t-mkoQ for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 01:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB9281A870E for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 01:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f79046d000007f53-fb-55b0ac43f9cf
Received: from ESESSHC005.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id BE.F9.32595.34CA0B55; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 10:56:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 10:56:35 +0200
To: almeroth@cs.ucsb.edu, caceres@watson.ibm.com, alan@telchemy.com, robert.cole@jhuapl.edu, duffield@research.att.com, timur.friedman@lip6.fr, khedayat@brixnet.com, ksarac@utdallas.edu, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in
References: <20150603191312.B7043180209@rfc-editor.org>
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <55B0AC41.4090500@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 10:56:33 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150603191312.B7043180209@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmphkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3RtdlzYZQg3XfWSyu3etnt5h+5i+j xZaVE1gsXvasZLeY33ma3eLyneuMFgvmrGOz+PT9PovF8UMHmC36Ft9hsbgzYwe7xYEF/9kc eDyWHf/G6vH8sa/HlycvmTxeXd3O5LFkyU8mj7vzrTz2bsnymLXzCYvH/yfzWTyOzT/H6HHj +At2j3MbjQN4orhsUlJzMstSi/TtErgyjm2Yy1LwWL7i9bm37A2MlyS6GDk5JARMJHp2/GWC sMUkLtxbz9bFyMUhJHCUUeLo/3fMEM5yRon2Zz/AqoQFzCUm3//PCpIQEfjOKPFk0ysWkIQQ UOLt3z6gIg4OZgFDiZ9tJiBhNgELiZs/GtlAbF4BbYkVW+6B2SwCqhKrb50GaxUViJGYv2I6 M0SNoMTJmU/A4pxAvZOn9DJDjLSXeLC1DCTMLCAv0bx1NjPEVm2JhqYO1gmMgrOQdM9C6JiF pGMBI/MqRtHi1OKk3HQjY73Uoszk4uL8PL281JJNjMBoO7jlt+oOxstvHA8xCnAwKvHwPmja ECrEmlhWXJl7iFGag0VJnHfG5rxQIYH0xJLU7NTUgtSi+KLSnNTiQ4xMHJxSDYzNj/y8Iu3F /VnTz05McJQMr1ydzMj2fFfvyml5Oa/6YmzW/O6VKXkwu2M21/PknsMPJudxX1FIz/u8yVkl TuX+5TAB5Ykzn+V/0FrImrsjlXO+J+uN1tJFLieikw5vkvqSUiq1hd1m5hJOoznrmqSeVYtt 1p/sfvkmT/OxE+4V0hH3L34r/6XEUpyRaKjFXFScCAAgF0+ZlwIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/aSxRaVrUAGssVmvzA3OqpJnKoI0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 04:05:10 -0700
Cc: tong_zhou@cable.comcast.com, avt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3611 (4386)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:57:32 -0000

Hi,

Thanks for reporting this Errata. I have done a personal estimation of 
this errata. The report is correct that there are only 63 packets in the 
vector. However, reviewing the example I don't see that any point of the 
example is lost or being confused by this. Because of this I would 
suggest that this Errata is moved into

Hold for Document update

Feedback on this is appreciated.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund
(Chair)

Den 2015-06-03 kl. 21:13, skrev RFC Errata System:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3611,
> "RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3611&eid=4386
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Tong Zhou <tong_zhou@cable.comcast.com>
>
> Section: 4.7.2
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>     For example, a 1 denotes a received packet, 0 a lost packet, and X a
>     discarded packet in the following pattern covering 64 packets:
>
>        11110111111111111111111X111X1011110111111111111111111X111111111
>        |---------gap----------|--burst---|------------gap------------|
>
>     The burst consists of the twelve packets indicated above, starting at
>     a discarded packet and ending at a lost packet.  The first gap starts
>     at the beginning of the session and the second gap ends at the time
>     of the report.
>
>     If the packet spacing is 10 ms and the Gmin value is the recommended
>     value of 16, the burst duration is 120 ms, the burst density 0.33,
>     the gap duration 230 ms + 290 ms = 520 ms, and the gap density 0.04.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>     For example, a 1 denotes a received packet, 0 a lost packet, and X a
>     discarded packet in the following pattern covering 64 packets:
>
>        11110111111111111111111X111X1011110111111111111111111X1111111111
>        |---------gap----------|--burst---|------------gap------------|
>
>     The burst consists of the twelve packets indicated above, starting at
>     a discarded packet and ending at a lost packet.  The first gap starts
>     at the beginning of the session and the second gap ends at the time
>     of the report.
>
>     If the packet spacing is 10 ms and the Gmin value is the recommended
>     value of 16, the burst duration is 120 ms, the burst density 0.33,
>     the gap duration 230 ms + 290 ms = 520 ms, and the gap density 0.04.
>
> Notes
> -----
> The pattern in the example shows 63 packets rather than 64. Added a "1" at the end. Another option is to keep the pattern unchanged, and redo the math.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC3611 (draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-report-extns-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)
> Publication Date    : November 2003
> Author(s)           : T. Friedman, Ed., R. Caceres, Ed., A. Clark, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Audio/Video Transport
> Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                 | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------