[AVTCORE] Re: I-D Action: draft-lennox-sdp-raw-key-fingerprints-00.txt

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Fri, 18 October 2024 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B06C1D5C72 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=telurix.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SibttK6XsZFg for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E4E9C1DFD54 for <avt@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-539d9bfc5d1so408655e87.0 for <avt@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix.com; s=google; t=1729292608; x=1729897408; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cF8v5woG/GjJLSosdC39fPiOTaHFdgGejtFCQF3tNvU=; b=MwOEqnxFGxXIX4OvUZ5GBcX9mrRPrHy3cu4OuQd0k2E3TNwtUi8CJborOwrLIrSDUt IGoC4JjcmPJh+RwfSvYu7D1AlSxPi+uAvhiwae/vGHeDtjk9UwRsrhjL6ERzG3jYQc0H gEePf/HH5acrFc7DQLOORN7j4+F9ZwGaa0akY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729292608; x=1729897408; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=cF8v5woG/GjJLSosdC39fPiOTaHFdgGejtFCQF3tNvU=; b=NZcouFuHCnOGI8cXolqMuT0E3p5zmtQJGQ1rVcdXo+W6wT4hs+pFKh0ReBoKG8PHgr LUCNgBohkjSP7oov5KwxjN0R1rmpbl+Utunzd/crnoCmLxU3DU079S8QExGsjzgld81j wwAzG325fsKRb62V024m6wdGFO61yXYLjsAQ1+Ond9O6z0wdVErJVdg8y/mNZYocZe8x G4nSz7e1HxJ8puohsGnDv06kV9apiVXDB6ATnLZ+6GcuSvboJzwm3ice4nAnD2TzvXjC /RfttgkbxHXK8NWbDba6ZVI7VFvOaqRm1kR7/EPXysm0agn0PKvXehHGJK+TPgne522w CEIQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWhFyNHAQ1VJKDagYEzA37PWJ8zePpR2F6qomk0eI+VvjvSnOYS7PbtNagKfZAG+ttXm5I=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyD+0ocmOFTcGoAJKioykQ5XExqWLqGozJwvbWZELdq7Lgj3NTR KUndVQaEx4p16NpYLxWfGbD9uRjJ0Gv7CnKydhoA9OAwR6lUvgiIMqJZY0BVl8fgevDS+kx4ssk k
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF5O819Nyx28o+O5zaMoPYGP6VqXAA6kgKXE4Z32WxqWpCipeh5MuUseneotaG53eTI1KNg5g==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3d8d:b0:53a:a26:568d with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53a1522dce0mr633109e87.5.1729292607833; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (mail-lf1-f48.google.com. [209.85.167.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2adb3069b0e04-53a152046e7sm351012e87.201.2024.10.18.16.03.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-539fbe22ac0so3142752e87.2; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWdMQiuSkV8S2MQNJ66AWzPDlk8L6rgkoq2r0zW8LZZr53jaB7twc7R5sEBJLhk6spH853q7MzA@ietf.org, AJvYcCXC57/a7vXn3o+C895rI+gdvEz75NUcaZU6KjJjd0z8J0axSqBtJsCTuoU9K9L6W87M2Ys=@ietf.org
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1243:b0:539:f7a2:65ac with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53a15233854mr2862515e87.35.1729292606514; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <172928612918.1576603.10331362486173581644@dt-datatracker-78dc5ccf94-w8wgc> <B87EBD43-908A-464B-A888-412030A3E60E@8x8.com>
In-Reply-To: <B87EBD43-908A-464B-A888-412030A3E60E@8x8.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:03:13 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxvji=+C4-ZZQT9ZQ5OKcWgPv_QV=iV+jj1kGQopyf6hVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxvji=+C4-ZZQT9ZQ5OKcWgPv_QV=iV+jj1kGQopyf6hVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan.lennox=408x8.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008633d00624c84fab"
Message-ID-Hash: TXJE6S5MOBL7A6JUHSVLFASCLS7S3TL6
X-Message-ID-Hash: TXJE6S5MOBL7A6JUHSVLFASCLS7S3TL6
X-MailFrom: roman@telurix.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-avt.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mmusic@ietf.org, avt@ietf.org, rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [AVTCORE] Re: I-D Action: draft-lennox-sdp-raw-key-fingerprints-00.txt
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/bN6s6jtZDz6rppHAb3MgEYZDqjg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:avt-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:avt-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:avt-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Jonathan,

I do support this draft since it will simplify and optimize common WebRTC
use cases.

This draft should take into account RFC 8842 and tls-id use in addition to
connection:new/existing.

Best Regards,
_____________
Roman Shpount


On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 5:32 PM Jonathan Lennox <jonathan.lennox=
408x8.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi, all —
>
> I have submitted this draft defining how to use raw public keys (rather
> than self-signed certificates) in TLS or DTLS negotiated with SDP, with of
> course the specific use case in mind of SDP-negotiated DTLS/SRTP such as is
> used in WebRTC.
>
> Comments are welcome, as well as any suggestions as to the best forum in
> which to develop this work; the base TLS in SDP (i.e. “a=fingerprint”) work
> was done in MMUSIC, but that group is closing down.
>
> Thank you!
>
> > On Oct 18, 2024, at 5:15 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> >
> > Internet-Draft draft-lennox-sdp-raw-key-fingerprints-00.txt is now
> available.
> >
> >   Title:   Session Description Protocol Fingerprints for Raw Public Keys
> in (Datagram) Transport Layer Security
> >   Author:  Jonathan Lennox
> >   Name:    draft-lennox-sdp-raw-key-fingerprints-00.txt
> >   Pages:   9
> >   Dates:   2024-10-18
> >
> > Abstract:
> >
> >   This document defines how to negotiate the use of raw keys for TLS
> >   and DTLS with the Session Description Protocol (SDP).  Raw keys are
> >   more efficient than certificates for typical uses of TLS and DTLS
> >   negotiated with SDP, without loss of security.
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lennox-sdp-raw-key-fingerprints/
> >
> > There is also an HTML version available at:
> >
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-lennox-sdp-raw-key-fingerprints-00.html
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> > rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
> To unsubscribe send an email to avt-leave@ietf.org
>