Re: [AVTCORE] WG last call on draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis-01

"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Tue, 26 March 2013 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4BA21F851E for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 02:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8MAiKL2mJpx for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 02:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797BA21F8511 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 02:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2964; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1364291865; x=1365501465; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=BunB9o4Z1Z6GcUDx0WwjSuDdtriH8DXTKxIx31CEAtc=; b=OLWsC+eccC9wMoZIn6U2Fr9BeMy4N1vfeiMTFar5C0Qn6ZZ1YzO58DAz WdHZquE75ejlwJkg3jk09K9pjRPMk4r6fKJH/qYi+K4WecTRwxsmXmSqd Edn/SrWhDW0xOYApNnT1Sy7+X9WCCsUgsNBiF1Sma5h2siOKHDMZUARsc E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkEFAHZwUVGtJV2a/2dsb2JhbABDgmeDFlq9Kw16FoEqgh8BAQEEDBcRRQwCBAEGAhEDAQIBAgIGHQMCBBkXFAEICAIEDgUIiAwBlA+bBIJAkBEEgR+NPAIWGwcGgicyYQOnboMKgig
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,911,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="191534012"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2013 09:57:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2Q9viww003050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:57:44 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com ([fe80::747b:83e1:9755:d453]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 04:57:44 -0500
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [AVTCORE] WG last call on draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis-01
Thread-Index: AQHOH1SRBgQ8NzU4bUC2VIRlvWTydpi2+uKA///tk62AATsWAIAAExuA
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:57:02 +0000
Message-ID: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940CF74D47@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <51516F22.3050501@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206
x-originating-ip: [10.61.98.206]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <A27F1DB72C50A34C8DC94E460642B83A@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis@tools.ietf.org>, "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] WG last call on draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis-01
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:57:46 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 11:49 AM
To: "Ali C. Begen" <abegen@cisco.com>
Cc: "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>,
"draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis@tools.ietf.org"
<draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] WG last call on draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis-01

>On 2013-03-25 21:00, Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote:
>> Thanks for the review.
>> 
>> On Mar 25, 2013, at 5:07 PM, "Magnus Westerlund"
>> <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> wonder of its persistence behavior as it says to use the MAC of
>>> the Interface that ones initiate the communication over. With
>>> multiple interfaces, I can in the context of an application use all
>>> of these interfaces over a set of calls. Thus it doesn't have
>>> particular good long term stability either.
>> 
>> I think it is meant to say the interface over which the initial
>> connection was made not all other possible interfaces that could be
>> used during the rtp session.
>>> 
>
>The main point I try to get across is that which interface you use for
>the initial connection varies between different communication
>establishments. If your goal is to have a long term persistent
>identifier then you need to store the first one used in the context of
>an application and use that, rather than take the interface you used for
>the SIP dialog, or similar, used to establish this particular RTP
>session(s).

The text is not saying to use MAC for long-term persistent CNAME. It says
to use it for *short-term* persistency. Sorry, I am not getting where
there is unclarity.


>
>Cheers
>
>Magnus Westerlund
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
>Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
>SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>