Re: [AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-02

"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Tue, 26 January 2016 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9A01B3228 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:08:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j98_Ml36y4TL for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:08:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B15A21B3211 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:08:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1132; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1453846135; x=1455055735; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=lT0JM5Y62F0P13bzFhTlFkHG/T4gCO00+edd6loA320=; b=mQPEJBqrSl874FRf45ScK3tIFvo3jbld2VWSnC4zb6TxXVwiMNyAtcY5 xT3iLXPqbgMRC0nCgViehdQWOkniNDCqeXc/gCMz/d9wj2s8igdlLsCMK YOHp2nYYyGKiz4Lr4QA867F2V0KibPFFLb+81buDuNg1cJKgqDV2Vnw0A c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AAAgAe7adW/5ldJa1eDoMsUm0GiFGyH?= =?us-ascii?q?QENgWIYCoVtAoFQOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEQQEBAQMBAQEBNz8FCwIBCA4KHhAnCyU?= =?us-ascii?q?CBA4FiBMIDr50AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEQSGMgGCAoJphEmDLoEPB?= =?us-ascii?q?ZZ5AY1VgV6Ha4UwinCDUQEeAQFCgy08aodIfAEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,351,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="231612412"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Jan 2016 22:08:54 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (xch-aln-008.cisco.com [173.36.7.18]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u0QM8ssv028341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:08:54 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com (173.36.7.19) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:08:53 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) by XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:08:53 -0600
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Thread-Topic: [AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-02
Thread-Index: AQHRWIJh7X0E1jc5qUW4H3Jzl9ERrZ8Ov9mA
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:08:53 +0000
Message-ID: <C5EA42B2-D6FD-4F71-94B4-AAC197DC5E11@cisco.com>
References: <55894FE8.6080406@ericsson.com> <55FB1E25.7020702@acm.org> <55FC3935.6050605@alum.mit.edu> <560522EF.5000608@acm.org> <56055974.5060702@alum.mit.edu> <56A7D67A.10408@acm.org> <56A7E817.9020708@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <56A7E817.9020708@alum.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.235.50]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <A967A29D39433544B8CE4B4B9FF879C6@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/dtKGDFMh3QcQkBIDIy7m6neMIlw>
Cc: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>, "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-02
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:08:59 -0000

Thanks for the review, Paul.  Posted an -05  addressing both your points.

Cheers,

Gonzalo


> On Jan 26, 2016, at 1:41 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> On 1/26/16 3:26 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> 
>> After more discussions between authors, we decided to remove the section about ordering altogether.  We now think that even if the proposal is not as future-proof as possible, it is good enough.
> 
> This works better for me. Thanks!
> 
> A few comments on -04:
> 
> * Section 5 (Terminology):
> 
> This is now section 5. That seems wrong. The document will read better if you make it section 2.
> 
> * Section 6 (RFC5764 Updates):
> 
> The new text still has some remnants of the ordering. In particular: "Then if ... Then if ... Then if ... Else if ...".
> 
> I suggest changing this to "If ... If ... If ... If ...".
> 
> Otherwise I'm happy.
> 
> 	Thanks,
> 	Paul
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
> avt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt