Re: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-02.txt
Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org> Tue, 24 March 2015 23:19 UTC
Return-Path: <petithug@acm.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F371A8ADF for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.236
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.236 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dqJWExsUrAkj for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [IPv6:2604:3400:dc1:41:216:3eff:fe5b:8240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0101A1A52 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:370:136:c617:feff:feb6:86ed] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:136:c617:feff:feb6:86ed]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Marc Petit-Huguenin", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6685F20205 for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:19:29 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5511F0FF.60601@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:19:27 -0500
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: avt@ietf.org
References: <20150324231214.26094.18113.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150324231214.26094.18113.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/eytH7YSheUPB31O-ClbNeSc7p_E>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-02.txt
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:19:31 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Here's the merged changelog since -00: - - Instead of allocating the values that are common on each registry, the specification now only reserves them, giving the possibility to allocate them in case muxing is irrelevant. - - STUN range is now 0-3 with 2-3 being Designated Expert. - - TLS ContentType 0-19 and 64-255 are now reserved. - - If an implementation uses the source IP address/port to separate TURN channels packets then the whole channel numbers range is available. - - If not the prefix is between 64 and 79.</t> - - The first byte test order is now by incremental values, so failure is deterministic. - - Packets that do not match are dropped. - - Redrawn the demuxing diagram. - - Adoption by WG. Reviews are appreciated. We would like to get to WGLC before Prague. Thanks. On 03/24/2015 06:12 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Multiplexing Scheme Updates for Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Extension for Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) > Authors : Marc Petit-Huguenin > Gonzalo Salgueiro > Filename : draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-02.txt > Pages : 12 > Date : 2015-03-24 > > Abstract: > This document defines how Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS), > Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP), Real-time Transport Control > Protocol (RTCP), Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN), and > Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) packets are multiplexed on a > single receiving socket. It overrides the guidance from SRTP > Extension for DTLS [RFC5764], which suffered from three issues > described and fixed in this document. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-02 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-02 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance > avt@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt > - -- Marc Petit-Huguenin Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVEfD/AAoJECnERZXWan7ELh0P/Rdt0KOh5p7bJZ8f6mrF4Xpb IPqeqn+RBFzy/ZQydebygzp7KhA+hAoa98In4VsqfM1rQrHlU2BWHtFWtyX2D5UW Rd5v3ZDF8ZwNuj2+US5Mw/HF4IIqJDEZFzTQQTduG40f/4edEeh5he3N+F33mEXR uCb197TFhYJrz9gZpKCrT7XVHwiB+ZhPiU2SknEgCh4Lp81aQBRzQJpIOW8Z6lJg ctky0FHXMoRLj/PqXrmVIDpG+JXSKi0I2Bvru5yahIB32OJbZ+CUGYKA4Sp/dPC5 CaSuK44jbUqREGRm/zoPdN+06AJ9gHnSWyyNwihVZH3o8CdhHFSlpCG3f8H8FMpr F3i8qyaj9uE8gT9KTS7rxtqCgcJK2Rp6BAHmYtEYNy0rgRe3RVEeYeJvhCkbLPmq or3ODHBqDyYm4iwFRNWw1gA247wIZVpr8W6IaabH2pz/4/c34t/wcumjfrA3f2AA hehYLqDm3OdWDUXcwAQDGIy1CiTkCPsgBDV57zwCzmo2vXYcwzk1AeCZKmbbQzW3 95pBw2FMAsbpVT120Z7BO47pXCDJzrXQFZja8hANubh916acbH2vNgSFYxFsOWf3 AmxNmyaGnJYyBDcT4Pch2EY/xagdEPokOVt4FB9bJDYvrF4cOimm7E2evNxU1PZA X/f814+eorRgY8ZMHsbP =XIQU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-… internet-drafts
- Re: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5… Marc Petit-Huguenin