IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AVTCORE] 6222bis

"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Thu, 11 April 2013 07:57 UTC

Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BE421F8A11 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XUn9usFM3t2P for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8475321F8A3F for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1750; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1365667036; x=1366876636; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=v41ovsnJcIBMtZ0xUnCgARMMDZAiduYr3LZGitBN52c=; b=Q6AM9fBk5Mm03WBdIFsVbRUV40KGc3jAjQPhBbdzqnh0LAheQwJLdMm8 JuNz1dSJV1ikxeTz1ZM8nshIdQmYIq4BxbTxGGoX1iWqzra2X6BaKZRPY CXzt8BOuDZuhCCGtxGBqIwLUd4vAfBGXF1rctNCH3LhfYZVs4A8XNAsSb k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AisFACpsZlGtJV2d/2dsb2JhbABQgmUhNoMuvh0NdBZ0gh8BAQEEAQEBIBFRBgEIEQMBAgMCBiACBB8GCxUICAIEARIIh3oDDwELq32JFA2JWQSBI4sggiI4BoIoMmEDlR2NVYUcgwuCKA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,454,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="197581063"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2013 07:57:16 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3B7vFjX001091 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:57:15 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com ([fe80::747b:83e1:9755:d453]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 02:57:15 -0500
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [AVTCORE] 6222bis
Thread-Index: AQHONhK9dPjRYaN1akKsO2TMTANSO5jRLlOA
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:55:52 +0000
Message-ID: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940CFCE8EB@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUXgT14XXpN9qURB6rtxVjcLsS_uxwijiY-99nXwta5Jw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206
x-originating-ip: [10.61.98.223]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <35E6FAF79FDFE04AA5A459AA0126187B@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] 6222bis
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:57:17 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 8:42 PM
To: "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>, Magnus Westerlund
<magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Subject: [AVTCORE] 6222bis

>As requested of RTCWEB, I have read this document.  It is good and
>should be published.
>
>I suspect that many people find it hard to get excited enough about
>this to bother reading it.  It's just not that interesting a subject.
>Especially since this is entirely non-controversial.

Compared to rtcweb stuff, yeah.
>
>I feel a little uncomfortable that the document justifies its
>existence (as a -bis) largely based on a reference to an individual
>draft.  I would prefer to see the rationale presented in an appendix
>instead; it's fairly important information to retain.

If you really feel strong about it, we can consider it but the current
draft mentions why we are doing this bis (due to the linkability of the
CNAMEs resulting from 6222 algorithms). For the purpose of 6222bis, where
that linkability comes from is not really essential IMO.

-acbegen

>_______________________________________________
>Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
>avt@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email