Re: [AVTCORE] WG last call on draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis-01

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Tue, 26 March 2013 09:49 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409DE21F88D6 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 02:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YkbPXHUxU4Ur for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 02:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4209A21F88D8 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 02:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7f0d6d000007e61-a0-51516f2387ab
Received: from esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 97.A0.32353.32F61515; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:49:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:49:23 +0100
Message-ID: <51516F22.3050501@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:49:22 +0100
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
References: <513F7C5B.5060101@ericsson.com>, <51507647.1050802@ericsson.com> <35F99675-E69A-48E6-BB17-CDF2A59B2FA3@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <35F99675-E69A-48E6-BB17-CDF2A59B2FA3@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja5yfmCgwfS1YhYPts9ltHjZs5Ld 4vSEe4wOzB5Tfm9k9Viy5CeTx5fLn9kCmKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4Mua+nsZUsI6nYsOHfqYG xmauLkZODgkBE4ntxx+yQdhiEhfurQeyuTiEBE4yShxouwXlLGeUuHutl6mLkYODV0BbYsJ0 N5AGFgFViT9T5rGD2GwCFhI3fzSCDRIVCJb4+eoMC4jNKyAocXLmEzBbREBPYn/HNEYQm1mg VuLui/WsILawgIvEv0kPwOJCAjUSlyacBrM5BWwlLi2aywpxnKTElhft7BC9ehJTrrZAzZGX aN46mxmiV1uioamDdQKj0Cwkq2chaZmFpGUBI/MqRvbcxMyc9HLzTYzA8D245bfBDsZN98UO MUpzsCiJ84a7XggQEkhPLEnNTk0tSC2KLyrNSS0+xMjEwSnVwLgloJBdxPJyuJas3dZVG/8F F/KvelPqutpa+lWuu/39/1vzfDVZD7jE7biw94T5yvWVy/Uzl2Ts1z40Zeb7zD2r3U0mHNzK L+qouvTQl71zp9kWezBq/LuyYNXV9MlV92yV90+wE6pOmPtsT9XPx4IMqV2X3qYoJx2sTp2f nzU5q1hEUcTAu0CJpTgj0VCLuag4EQDk9utwLQIAAA==
Cc: "draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis@tools.ietf.org>, "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] WG last call on draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis-01
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:49:26 -0000

On 2013-03-25 21:00, Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote:
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> On Mar 25, 2013, at 5:07 PM, "Magnus Westerlund"
> <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
>> wonder of its persistence behavior as it says to use the MAC of
>> the Interface that ones initiate the communication over. With
>> multiple interfaces, I can in the context of an application use all
>> of these interfaces over a set of calls. Thus it doesn't have
>> particular good long term stability either.
> 
> I think it is meant to say the interface over which the initial
> connection was made not all other possible interfaces that could be
> used during the rtp session.
>> 

The main point I try to get across is that which interface you use for
the initial connection varies between different communication
establishments. If your goal is to have a long term persistent
identifier then you need to store the first one used in the context of
an application and use that, rather than take the interface you used for
the SIP dialog, or similar, used to establish this particular RTP
session(s).

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------