Re: [AVTCORE] Alissa Cooper's Yes on draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-05: (with COMMENT)

[Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]>]

Hi Alissa,

Thanks for your comments! See inline.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

>"If the answerer includes an "a=rtcp-mux" attribute in the answer, the
>  offerer and answerer MUST multiplex RTP and RTCP packets on a single
>  port.
>
>  If the answer does not contain an "a=rtcp-mux" attribute, the offerer
>  and answerer MUST NOT multiplex RTP and RTCP packets on a single port."
>
> The first of these says "the answerer" and the second says "the answer."
> This is also how the text appears in 5761, but the difference between them 
> caught my eye here because of the other changes being made. Is the intended 
> meaning different between "the answerer" and the "the answer"?
>
> That is, is the implication that if the answerer include a=rtcp-mux but that somehow
> gets modified such that when the answer arrives at the offerer, it no longer contains 
> a=rtcp-mux, that neither side is supposed to multiplex? This made a little more sense 
> to me in 5761 because it was only about what the offerer should do, but now it is about
> what both parties should do, so I think it would help to clarify whether these two 
> statements are both about what the answerer puts in the answer.

The previous paragraph is about what the answerer puts in the answer, so I suggest to modify:

	"If the answerer includes an "a=rtcp-mux" attribute in the answer,..."

...to:

	"If the answer contains an "a=rtcp-mux" attribute answer,..."

Regards,

Christer