Re: [AVTCORE] WGLC on srtp not mandatory and security options drafts -reminder

Re: [AVTCORE] WGLC on srtp not mandatory and security options drafts -reminder - please review !!!!!!!

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Mon, 30 September 2013 09:55 UTC

From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: avt@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:51:17 +0300
Message-ID: <044201cebdc2$9eed4ce0$dcc7e6a0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0443_01CEBDDB.C43B6F40"
Thread-Index: Ac69wpu2+t+bPRdgQs6Igac2m0PqsA==
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] WGLC on srtp not mandatory and security options drafts -reminder - please review !!!!!!!
Precedence: list

Hi,

We had earlier reviews from Dan Wing and Alan Johnston.

The WG chairs will appreciate more reviews. So the WGLC will be extended by
one week till October 6Th .

Thanks

Roni Even

AVTcore co-chair

 

 

 

From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com] 
Sent: 04 September, 2013 1:42 PM
To: avt@ietf.org
Subject: WGLC on srtp not mandatory and security options drafts

 

Hi,

The chairs of AVTcore would like to start a WGLC on the following two
drafts:

1.       Securing the RTP Protocol Framework: Why RTP Does Not Mandate a
Single Media Security Solution in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-13 

2.       Options for Securing RTP Sessions in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options-06 

These documents are related and we would like to move them forward together.

We had good reviews thanks to  Dan Wings and Alan Johnston and are looking
for more reviews also from non-security expert people

The WGLC will end on September 29th . 

Please review and send comments to the list.

Thanks

Roni Even

Re: [AVTCORE] WGLC on srtp not mandatory and secu… Roni Even