IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AVTCORE] Errata on RFC 5764 (Errata 3913)

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Fri, 30 January 2015 02:38 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5A01A88F2 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:38:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o6iSzzYSBcn8 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:38:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-po-01v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-01v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe16:19:96:114:154:160]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEAB11A88EA for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:38:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-po-15v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.239]) by resqmta-po-01v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id m2eX1p0025AAYLo012esGk; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 02:38:52 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([24.34.72.61]) by resomta-po-15v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id m2er1p00D1KKtkw012eryh; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 02:38:52 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t0U2co4Z023526; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 21:38:50 -0500
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id t0U2co6j023522; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 21:38:50 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <54C8FED8.1000403@ericsson.com> (magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 21:38:50 -0500
Message-ID: <87pp9xgfgl.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1422585532; bh=sJPecFXcSi1z7JjDzw9f8yaUVsK5vrFpBRVoibh63p8=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=GNJTK3OVTpqWL+/Uzl71wiWS88QfGgAbFUs26bUQ8CEmoI++fei8X9479YVUSIOgv m2W0hxXVxF852nkSndWLlU2k3tvReBgMB3blrLJuWFol1ZNrzJ2t03jHKGAXBWLr0R STKkq1PhOIgVdOud+r4TN927BuHLoxxdDv9r0x9Eei1RiJL6YIUmWv51eL+rK2Sufm 02wfmPU7cCQrwleSpde91nC2bL05kcyGyUpZQ3nC1F9DigYGEJUHjHSSlr6YZI8lr2 Zp3hKnPfwISUtD87IIqnaifgoscX0Wje+cL+0RB4QJaqCE6cVVqwnxdHukJ3ChoNCo vi88p0Crasodw==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/jlW6D1GgNWPkiq6lOsdW3adjsWI>
Cc: avt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Errata on RFC 5764 (Errata 3913)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 02:38:54 -0000

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> writes:
> I think a reasonable handling of this one would
> be to put it into the "Held for Documents Update" category.

This makes sense to me, but I think the following sentence is not as
informative as it needs to be:  "STUN messages with methods identifiers
of 1280 or higher cannot be demultiplexed."  The statement should tell
what happens, e.g., "STUN messages with method identifiers of 1280 or
higher are indistinguishable from ***, so such method identifiers must
be avoided when ***."

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email