Re: [AVT] Re: Clearmode definition.

--> Rajesh Kumar <rkumar@cisco.com> writes:
> At 08:12 PM 3/18/2004 +0000, Colin Perkins wrote:
> >--> Rajesh Kumar <rkumar@cisco.com> writes:
> > > Are there plans to address N x 64 clear mode (N > 1) in
> > > draft-ietf-avt-rtp-clearmode-04.txt ?
> > >
> > > One method might be to have N as a MIME parameter.
> > >
> > > I recommend that we do.
> >
> >No. This is explicitly out of scope of AVT, and will be addressed in the
> >PWE3 working group.
> 
> I do not understand why 64 kbps clearmode is any different from 384 kbps.
> 
> Both can be negotiated codecs for a session type. N x 64 should be 
> negotiable session by session and not just relegated to the provisioned 
> tunnel category. I recommend a MIME definition for it if you do not want
> to fold it into the MIME for 64 kbps clear mode, although I would prefer
> the latter.

As I mentioned before, the PWE3 working group is the appropriate place to
discuss this question. 

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt