Re: [AVTCORE] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-13
Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 12 April 2023 13:10 UTC
Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525B4C151546; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 06:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8PghzGpgGDUc; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 06:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5949C14CE4D; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 06:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:fd06:59fa:7e15:d1b0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C77720957; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 16:10:30 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 16:10:27 +0300
Message-Id: <A0F7AD55-7A87-42E0-A81D-1481155E4B32@eggert.org>
References: <164893763381.16148.7450553628057512967@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking.all@ietf.org, avt@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <164893763381.16148.7450553628057512967@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 4C77720957.A290C
X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/o-bBxlpAULk2W-1eTFaIWXjzemA>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-13
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:10:39 -0000
Gyan, thank you for the review. I entered a No Objection ballot. Lars > On 3. Apr 2022, at 01:14, Gyan Mishra via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > Reviewer: Gyan Mishra > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-?? > Reviewer: Gyan Mishra > Review Date: 2022-04-02 > IETF LC End Date: 2022-04-08 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > > This document describes a Frame Marking RTP header extension used to convey > information about video frames that is critical for error recovery and packet > forwarding in RTP middleboxes or network nodes. > > Major issues: > None > > Minor issues: > None > > Nits/editorial comments: > The document is well written and ready for publication. As this is an > experimental what is the scope and length for f the time for the experiment? > What is the goal after the experiment is concluded? This should be stated in > the draft. I see there are IANA considerations and how does that change if any > for allocations once the experiment concludes and this draft progresses to an > IETF standard. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [AVTCORE] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-a… Gyan Mishra via Datatracker
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Gen-art] Genart last call review o… Lars Eggert