Re: [AVTCORE] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-13

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 12 April 2023 13:10 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525B4C151546; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 06:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8PghzGpgGDUc; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 06:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5949C14CE4D; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 06:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:fd06:59fa:7e15:d1b0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C77720957; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 16:10:30 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 16:10:27 +0300
Message-Id: <A0F7AD55-7A87-42E0-A81D-1481155E4B32@eggert.org>
References: <164893763381.16148.7450553628057512967@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking.all@ietf.org, avt@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <164893763381.16148.7450553628057512967@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 4C77720957.A290C
X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/o-bBxlpAULk2W-1eTFaIWXjzemA>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-13
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:10:39 -0000

Gyan, thank you for the review. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Lars

> On 3. Apr 2022, at 01:14, Gyan Mishra via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Gyan Mishra
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-??
> Reviewer: Gyan Mishra
> Review Date: 2022-04-02
> IETF LC End Date: 2022-04-08
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This document describes a Frame Marking RTP header extension used to convey
> information about video frames that is critical for error recovery and packet
> forwarding in RTP middleboxes or network nodes.
> 
> Major issues:
> None
> 
> Minor issues:
> None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> The document is well written and ready for publication.   As this is an
> experimental what is the scope and length for f the time for the experiment?
> What is the goal after the experiment is concluded? This should be stated in
> the draft.  I see there are IANA considerations and how does that change if any
> for allocations once the experiment concludes and this draft progresses to an
> IETF standard.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art