[AVTCORE] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-05

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 25 May 2017 22:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF21128CFF; Thu, 25 May 2017 15:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EhPi_rHufKSG; Thu, 25 May 2017 15:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7158A127B52; Thu, 25 May 2017 15:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.63] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v4PMlUML085257 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 25 May 2017 17:47:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.63]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Message-Id: <D54F2BC9-8823-403A-B6A8-38C7282925EB@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 17:47:30 -0500
To: draft-ietf-avtext-lrr.all@ietf.org, avt@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/o9zIqf5beK55xOykhljRpbZqGqM>
Subject: [AVTCORE] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-05
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 22:47:36 -0000

Hi,

This is my AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-05. I only have a couple of editorial comments, which can be handled along with any IETF Last Call comments. I will request IETF Last Call shortly.

Thanks!

Ben.

————————

-3.2, last paragraph: the “MAY” seems like a statement of fact, rather than normative permission. Please consider lower case.

-4.3, 2nd paragraph: " 
Figure 8 shows the format of the layer index field for H.265 streams. The "RES" fields MUST be set to 0 on transmission and ignored on reception.”

Is that MUST a new normative requirement, or a reference to one in RFC 7798? If the later, please use descriptive (i.e. non-2119) language.