[AVTCORE] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message-08: (with COMMENT)

Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 20 September 2020 02:58 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietf.org
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3483A0E8F; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 19:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message@ietf.org, avtcore-chairs@ietf.org, avt@ietf.org, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, bernard.aboba@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.17.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <160057072101.12695.2250020642197640394@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 19:58:41 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/oSRa-Vms_GnYB0eWgNEKl-q22lo>
Subject: [AVTCORE] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 02:58:42 -0000

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


[[ questions ]]

[ section 3.1 ]

* If L=0, do we need text about how to treat report entries with
  non-zero ECN and ATO fields?

  Separately, what's a good mnemonic for "L"?  My instinct was to treat it
  as the "Loss" bit, but with the meaning the values 0 and 1 reversed that
  doesn't actually work very well.

[[ nits ]]

[ section 1 ]

* "to have generic...format" -> "to have a generic...format", perhaps

[ section 3.1 ]

* "sent previous reports" -> "previous reports sent", perhaps?

[ section 7 ]

* "a=ecn-capaable-rtp:" -> "a=ecn-capable-rtp:"

[ section 8 ]

* "ECN marking marking information" -> "ECN marking information"