[AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-14.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue, 15 October 2013 17:23 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF8011E818D; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aeqEs4oh39Zm; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F0D11E813F; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.80.p2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20131015172348.2118.92269.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:23:48 -0700
Cc: avt@ietf.org
Subject: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-14.txt
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:23:49 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Securing the RTP Protocol Framework: Why RTP Does Not Mandate a Single Media Security Solution
Author(s) : Colin Perkins
Magnus Westerlund
Filename : draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-14.txt
Pages : 9
Date : 2013-10-15
Abstract:
This memo discusses the problem of securing real-time multimedia
sessions, and explains why the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP),
and the associated RTP Control Protocol (RTCP), do not mandate a
single media security mechanism. Guidelines for designers and
reviewers of future RTP extensions are provided, to ensure that
appropriate security mechanisms are mandated, and that any such
mechanisms are specified in a manner that conforms with the RTP
architecture.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory
There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-14
A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-14
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-man… internet-drafts