IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AVTCORE] Errata 4192 RFC 3550

Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com> Thu, 11 December 2014 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <sperreault@jive.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA8A1A1B2F for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:30:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8NWQP1R-0fhG for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:30:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com (mail-la0-f49.google.com [209.85.215.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CF641A00B7 for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:30:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id hs14so4526042lab.8 for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:30:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RUGpSFczGmno4wcZeFiSGazQBZvEa4+geKfbxPGQ82g=; b=L4PxeIStvE6hQshFdFsPoVFEgpwcBPLx8e7AP4cUcPc2c5gIZkX90CY0lPlrdRS7MR LJMESnrUIM7gvXCUR1pgaWdjRjw0K4lvFTKuPxZZTHQBOZnlXP5CNmrQvT2ufFZZJsUl W3zOkB1xnWYjlkvChHg+xbHpAvOo8blvJZB1NPhTEqUIxMNTYOsjiz2ZwKWMyLdqxp0K /d4ypftVsNXHYYEMyOCx4e1bBtaiJ90bG/lDaXU54mzlIxOg6N2+TrdoLPXtWzVRfRSF HiZbLtJ3q7hG+uNYIV4GwZVFeDB6StfGlsmTfKj6ymODGMy9iTWiimOioDVlEIXmvYVm OCLQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkpJmc3Iq/Qy9ukG51wnjdMeLK0YOAVoFwit/9y0L+ZN7W1yOka0QotK5bCxx8FLkUxIxLn
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.168.164 with SMTP id zx4mr2741518lbb.28.1418319038501; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:30:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.84.145 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:30:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CACFvNHWW-HFWVPT2R04ywA9_vz6KkR+7SKC3BEiXDG0rWKN=ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACFvNHXjy+PxHaZsrjdO5SHg6PSaQVt_J8WPH6hQTKQKkdoo5A@mail.gmail.com> <877fxy6s9u.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <CACFvNHWW-HFWVPT2R04ywA9_vz6KkR+7SKC3BEiXDG0rWKN=ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:30:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CANO7kWC=3tRYHMuZp3NY9ZNQFAsur7me6xVCZiT6RGzJMm+Rdw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
To: Julius Friedman <juliusfriedman@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2356477f0790509f42218"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/qD_aM6qpdEZVcdFD5umO2rYD100
Cc: avt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Errata 4192 RFC 3550
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:30:41 -0000

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Julius Friedman <juliusfriedman@gmail.com>
wrote:

> How can the items be excellent for a draft but not consideration for
> errata?


Errata is appropriate when an RFC doesn't reflect what the working group
meant.
A draft is appropriate when an RFC does reflect what the working group
meant, but the working group was wrong.

Simon

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status