[AVTCORE] Re: Errata on RFC 8888 - number of reports

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

It's done!!

Thanks for the discussion on the mailing list, I was waiting to see some
discussion in the mailing list.

//Zahed

On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 6:42 PM Jonathan Lennox <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Zahed - can you verify this Erratum?  Thanks!
>
> On Dec 20, 2024, at 6:45 AM, Colin Perkins <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I don’t recall the original intent, but I agree the errata makes sense.
> The WG Chair should poke the responsible AD to get it verified.
>
> Cheers,
> Colin
>
> On 20 Dec 2024, at 11:24, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>
> Thanks! I somehow missed it when looking for responses.
>
> I see that the RFC Editor still says the errata is in "reported" state,
> I'm looking for where I can poke to get it to be "verified".
>
> Harald
>
> On 12/19/24 16:02, Jonathan Lennox wrote:
>
> I responded to your previous mail but it was from an address with busted
> DMARC, so you may not have seen it.  Here’s what I said:
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *Jonathan Lennox [e-mail]
> *Subject: **[AVTCORE] Re: Errata on RFC 8888 - number of reports*
> *Date: *November 19, 2024 at 2:33:08 PM EST
> *To: *IETF AVTCore WG [e-mail]
>
> The suggested fix in the errata report looks like the correct fix to me.
> I'm 99% sure that's the way I implemented it when I was doing it in the
> Hackathon, too (sadly, in closed source at my previous employer).
>
> On Dec 19, 2024, at 5:49 AM, Harald Alvestrand [e-mail] wrote:
>
> I'm missing any response to this errata - it's kind of important since
> we're in the middle of coding this support, and we have verified that the
> disagreement over what it should say has led to interop issues.
>
> Anyone?
>
> Harald
>
> On 11/19/24 13:29, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>
> This was discovered during interop testing at IETF 121, but hasn't hit the
> list yet as far as I can see.
> Report:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8166
> Basically, there are two ways to interpret how many packets to report on
> in a feedback message, and Netflix and Chrome had chosen incompatible
> interpreations.
> Can we settle this one way or the other?
> Harald
> ------------------------------
>
> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>
>
>