[AVT] draft-wing-mmusic-symmetric-rtprtcp
"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Wed, 29 September 2004 00:24 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA08500 for <avt-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:24:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCSOE-0007c5-Ja for avt-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:32:15 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CCRxt-0007AT-Ue; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:05:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CCRW6-0006J5-P2; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:36:18 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA04215; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:36:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCRe1-00066N-2X; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:44:30 -0400
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2004 16:36:11 -0700
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from edison.cisco.com (edison.cisco.com [171.71.180.109]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i8SNZYlr021528; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DWINGW2K4 ([10.32.240.197] (may be forged)) by edison.cisco.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/CISCO.SERVER.1.2) with SMTP id QAA12578; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: IETF MMUSIC <mmusic@ietf.org>, IETF AVT mailing list <avt@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:35:36 -0700
Message-ID: <LIECKHBKICJFBLOMPHNMOEAINCAA.dwing@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF Behave Mailing List <ietf-behave@list.sipfoundry.org>
Subject: [AVT] draft-wing-mmusic-symmetric-rtprtcp
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: avt-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: avt-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I wanted to point folks at the following brief I-D which defines Symmetric RTP and Symmetric RTCP: Title : Symmetric RTP and RTCP Considered Helpful Author(s) : D. Wing Filename : draft-wing-mmusic-symmetric-rtprtcp-00.txt Pages : 8 Date : 2004-9-23 This document defines symmetric RTP and symmetric RTCP and recommends their use. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wing-mmusic-symmetric-rtprtcp-00.t xt I'd like this to be a standards-track RFC, so vendors can claim compliance to the RFC. It should probably be rolled into a document describing other endpoint requirements, but one doesn't currently exist; if BEHAVE turns into a WG it might make sense to put the text of -symmetric-rtprtcp- into an overall document describing how VoIP endpoints should behave when they're behind a Behave-compliant NAT. Comments welcome. -d _______________________________________________ Audio/Video Transport Working Group avt@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt