Re: [AVT] Fwd: Next steps for draft-ietf-avt-seed-srtp

So the key issue here is:

Do you (the WG) agree with draft-ietf-avt-seed-srtp becoming proposed standard rather than informational?

regards

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Robert Sparks
> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 12:18 PM
> To: avt@ietf.org
> Cc: Dan Wing
> Subject: [AVT] Fwd: Next steps for draft-ietf-avt-seed-srtp
> 
> All -
> 
> Based on IESG feedback, we are planning handle the 
> registrations for the use of SEED with SRTP the same way it 
> is handled for TLS and CMS. Dan will add text to the 
> introduction similar to Section 1.1 of RFC4162 and make a few 
> minor edits to make it even more clear that the mandatory to 
> implement requirements in Section 5 of this document apply 
> only to SRTP implementations that support SEED. Note there 
> are clarifications already added to the document in response 
> to its last IESG review reinforcing that this document does 
> not make SEED mandatory to implement.
> 
> I will take the document back to the IESG for approval as 
> Proposed Standard (it was previously processed as 
> Informational). Assuming the document clears in this form, I 
> propose we not move forward with draft-ietf-avt-register-srtp.
> 
> Please comment soon if you think we should be taking a different path.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> RjS
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
> 