Re: [AVT] Re: Clearmode definition.

--> Rajesh Kumar <rkumar999@comcast.net> writes:
...
> >Hence if you have a need for an RTP encapsulation of N*64k,
> >I would suggest that the AVT WG look into it,
> >trying to keep the encapsulation compatible with the
> >appropriate PWE draft.
> 
> This is what I requested from the AVT group but they indicated I go to
> the PWE3 group for it. However, if, between the two groups, we think that
> a MIME for nx64 over RTP will not be widely useful, then we can drop it. 
> Registration of vendor-specific MIMEs is also possible, but is this the
> way we want to go? Either way, I would like us in AVT and PWE3 to make a 
> conscious choice.

What would be the use case for having the MIME type registered? I've not
heard a reason why the mechanisms being developed in PWE3 are insufficient.

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt