[AVT] Re: avt Digest, Vol 15, Issue 16

Pro-MPEG forum has also done some work on FEC for streamed media.

Girish Chandran

avt-request@ietf.org wrote:

>Send avt mailing list submissions to
>	avt@ietf.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>	https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>	avt-request@ietf.org
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>	avt-owner@ietf.org
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of avt digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Proposed FEC Streaming Framework (Magnus Westerlund)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:42:27 +0200
>From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
>Subject: [AVT] Proposed FEC Streaming Framework
>To: IETF AVT WG <avt@ietf.org>, rmt@ietf.org
>Cc: Stephan.Wenger@nokia.com
>Message-ID: <42D61763.20704@ericsson.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>All,
>
>The below messge was sent to TSVWG. If you have comments on this please 
>respond to us author or the TSVWG.
>
>/Magnus Westerlund
>
>-----
>
>A few of us have been working on a framework for FEC protection of
>streaming media, based on some work done recently in 3GPP and making use
>of the FEC Building Block defined by RMT (so that the framework is not
>specific to a particular FEC code).
>
>This proposal is described in
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-watson-tsvwg-fec-sf-00.txt.
>Although intended primarily for streaming, it is not specific to RTP,
>defining instead an FEC protection layer above UDP, which can protect a
>set of several UDP flows.
>
>Since the proposal is not specific to either multicast or RTP, we are
>bringing it first to TSVWG, rather than RMT or AVT. It will be discussed
>at the Paris meeting, so please put it on your reading list.
>
>The questions for the TSVWG are (at least):
>1) is the objective of extending the RMT FEC Building Block framework to
>streaming a good one ?
>2) is this a good approach to that objective ?
>3) what is the relationship with the ULP work in AVT ?
>4) whether the proposal should best be progressed in AVT (where there is
>streaming expertise), in RMT (where there is FEC expertise) or in TSVWG
>?
>
>Regards,
>
>Mark Watson
>Digital Fountain
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Audio/Video Transport Working Group
>avt@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
>
>
>End of avt Digest, Vol 15, Issue 16
>***********************************
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt