Re: [AVT] 3GPP timed text draft: more generic?

--> "Jose Rey" <rey@panasonic.de> writes:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> during the presentation of the payload format for 3GPP timed text some
> concerns arose on whether this work should be more generic.  On the
> other hand I also emphasized the fact that there's a deadline to meet
> here for 3GPP Release 6: March '04.
> 
> It is our opinion that, in this case, a more specific payload format for
> the 3GPP timed text format is the right way to go. Does anybody think
> otherwise? We would like to hear comments/critic on this, in order to
> progress to working group work item.  How could it be made more generic?

A specific payload format for 3GPP timed text might be appropriate, but I
would like to understand the options and alternatives before we make that
choice. Is 3GPP the only body doing timed and/or decorated text? If not,
what are the alternatives, and how do they relate?

-- 
Colin Perkins
csp@csperkins.org

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt