[AVT] SRTP: question about MKI length
"Usha Sharma" <Usha_Sharma@net.com> Thu, 21 July 2005 06:19 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DvUPA-0007fF-Ft; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:19:36 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DvUP9-0007fA-0B for avt@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:19:35 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA29746 for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:19:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mx02.net.com ([134.56.3.132]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DvUt6-0005bJ-SX for avt@ietf.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:50:34 -0400
Received: from mx01-int.net.com (mx01-int.net.com [134.56.112.13]) by mx02.net.com (Switch-3.1.3/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id j6L6NGTL019134 for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fmt-ex01.net.com (fmt-ex01.net.com [134.56.112.251]) by mx01-int.net.com (Switch-3.1.3/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id j6L6FUOO013270 for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:18:50 -0700
Message-ID: <E5CB8BF27E39374ABE7C56E1FF20497C49030A@fmt-ex01.net.com>
Thread-Topic: SRTP: question about MKI length
Thread-Index: AcWNvA+yiuUd4s1JTfyf1sLFpPAmSA==
From: Usha Sharma <Usha_Sharma@net.com>
To: avt@ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=8.0 tests=AWL,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on fmt-spam02.net.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d185fa790257f526fedfd5d01ed9c976
Subject: [AVT] SRTP: question about MKI length
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0980944936=="
Sender: avt-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: avt-bounces@ietf.org
There is no description in RFC 3711 for upper limit of MKI length and range of MKI value. SDP (draft-ietf-mmusic-sdescriptions-11.txt) defines that MKI value is a positive integer and MKI length could be up to 128 byte. Is it worthwhile to use such big MKI value for voice applications, considering the bandwidth overhead introduced by it. What would be the optimal value of MKI length for most applications?
_______________________________________________ Audio/Video Transport Working Group avt@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
- [AVT] SRTP: question about MKI length Usha Sharma
- Re: [AVT] SRTP: question about MKI length Mark Baugher
- RE: [AVT] SRTP: question about MKI length Dondeti, Lakshminath
- Re: [AVT] SRTP: question about MKI length Mark Baugher